Laserfiche WebLink
ORONO CITY <br />Monday, <br />• 7:00 o <br />( #07 -3262 James and Corrine Beck, Continued) <br />Alexander stated according to the City's code, habi <br />considered habitable. <br />McMillan commented she could see this as being a <br />ordinance limiting the number of stories. <br />Alexander stated the existing house is technically a <br />should only be considered a two -story house given <br />basement remains unfinished. Alexander stated the <br />owners would like to retain but that the house is in <br />structural engineer has found the house to be very s <br />Rahn asked if the lakeside deck would have a roof <br />Alexander stated the roof over the deck currently <br />White inquired how old the existing structure is. <br />• Beck stated the original structure was constructed i <br />Bremer stated in her view this is a hardship lot and <br />indicated she has a concern with the house located <br />fact that the neighboring house is a rambler. <br />OF THE <br />INCIL MEETING <br />.y 14, 2007 <br />ck p.m. <br />rooms need to be seven feet high in order to be <br />exception to the City's newly adopted <br />ree -story house but that she would argue that it <br />height of the basement and the fact that the <br />are certain integral parts of the house that the <br />-d of some improvements. Alexander noted a <br />.cturally sound. <br />it under the new plans. <br />sts and that the other decks also currently exist. <br />1915, <br />at there is a small buildable area available. Bremer <br />the west and the height of this structure given the <br />Curtis stated the distance between the two houses is 50 feet. <br />Alexander stated the height of the proposed additi <br />currently exists. <br />Rahn moved, McMillan seconded, Application A <br />Corrine Beck, 3820 Cherry Avenue, to direct St <br />variance of 41.3 feet, a five foot side setback var <br />VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Bremer opposed. <br />Bremer stated she would like to see the structure <br />Alexander pointed out there are two foot <br />could remain. <br />Gaffron stated the allowed encroachment in the 0- <br />item be addressed in the resolution. <br />Rahn moved, McMillan seconded, to amend his <br />except where it parallels the five -foot setback. I <br />is approximately two to three feet higher than what <br />•3262, Kathy Alexander on behalf of James and <br />to draft a resolution approving a lake setback <br />ce, hardcover variances, and a height variance. <br />at two and a half stories. <br />on the existing structure and asked whether those-" <br />foot setback is 1.5 feet. Gaffron recommended that <br />n to allow the two -foot overhang everywhere <br />: Ayes 4, Nays 1, Bremer opposed. <br />PAGE 13 <br />