Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 14, 2007 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />( #07 -3259 Lake Country Builders, Continued) <br />Smolek stated there is a gazebo which will be removed as well as some other hardcover that will be <br />reduced near the pool. Smolek stated the hardcover around the pool is rather minimal except for one area <br />which functions as a gathering area. <br />McMillan moved, Rahn seconded, Application #0 -3259 Lake Country Builders for Kathy and Gary <br />Gangstee,1374 Rest Point Road, to direct Staff to draft an approval resolution granting a lot area <br />variance, a hardcover variance, a side setback variance, and a variance to Section 78 -1432. VOTE: <br />Ayes 4, Nays 1, Murphy Opposed. <br />Murphy stated he would like to see some further hardcover reductions around the pool. <br />10. #07 -3262 JAMES & CORRINE BECK, 3820 CHERRY AVENUE — VARIANCE <br />Kathryn Alexander, Architect, and James Beck, Applicant, were present. <br />Curtis stated the applicants are requesting the following variances: <br />A lake setback of 41.3 feet (for the house) and 29 feet (for the deck) where 75 feet is normally • <br />required; <br />2. A side setback variance to allow a five foot side yard setback where a 10 foot setback is normally <br />required and five feet currently exists; <br />Hardcover variances to allow 16.8 percent hardcover within the 0 -75 foot zone where 0 percent is <br />normally allowed and to allow 25 percent within the 75 -250 foot zone where 25 percent is <br />normally allowed and 27.3 percent currently exists. The 0 -75 foot zone and the 75 -250 foot zone <br />have not been adjusted to reflect the additional lakeshore along the eastern/wetland lot line. <br />a <br />4. A height variance is required as the lowest level is by definition the first story and this is a three <br />story house where only 2 %2 stories are allowed. <br />The Planning Commission heard this application on March 19 '11 and at that time directed the applicants to <br />revise their plan. Their direction to the applicants was to reduce the overall height of the home, <br />specifically within the 75 foot lake setback area; remove the second story encroachment into the <br />substandard side setback; and explore the wetland buffer possibilities.. The Planning Commission voted <br />3 -2 on April 160' to recommend approval of the revised request. The two dissenting commissioners <br />wanted a further reduction in the massing. <br />The applicants' proposed plan reflects technically a three -story home. While Staff continues to maintain <br />that the home should meet the two and a half story maximum, the applicants did address the issues the <br />Planning Commission outlined at the March meeting. <br />In an effort to maintain consistent hardcover accounting, the applicants should be required to submit <br />revised hardcover calculations prior to final Council review. The revised calculations should reflect the <br />accurate 0 -75 foot and 75 -250 foot setback zones from the 929.4 foot OHWL elevation. <br />PAGE 12 <br />