Laserfiche WebLink
_ MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, March 12, 2007 <br />• 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />• <br />• <br />( #07 -3254 MetroBuilding,, Continued) <br />The applicant's request to increase the mass of the <br />may not adversely impact the views of the lake enj <br />feel it is reasonable to allow this level of encroach <br />expanded. Further, the existing home encroaches <br />little to be done about this encroachment, Staff doi <br />encroachment. <br />Leintz stated they are proposing the same footprii <br />which helps to open up the view for the neighbor <br />with that neighbor regarding the change to the ro( <br />Leintz commented he did not get involved in this <br />modifications to the plan. Leintz stated the prop( <br />some other hardcover. Leintz stated the owners 1 <br />that if the project gets too costly, they would siml <br />hardcover would remain as is. <br />Leintz indicated they would be agreeable to rei <br />concrete in the back, and reduce the size of the <br />existing location. <br />Murphy stated if the property owners are wiling to <br />house could possibly be relocated further back in r <br />Leintz stated the house could be rebuilt in a diff( <br />a structural engineer and has been determined to <br />McMillan inquired how old the house is. <br />Leintz stated the residence is approximately 50 <br />the house since it was originally constructed. <br />ome ahead of the average lakeshore setback may or <br />fed by the adjacent property owner. Staff does not <br />-nt into the average lakeshore setback to be <br />to seven feet into the 75 -foot zone. While there is <br />not feel that it is appropriate to allow further <br />land that the one end is now proposed to be a hip roof, <br />om what currently exists. Leintz stated he has spoken <br />since the last Council meeting. <br />►ject until the end and that he has made some <br />owners are now willing to remove the pool as well as <br />;haled the property to fix it up and then resell it and <br />redo a portion of the interior of the house and the <br />g the pool, a portion of the driveway, some of the <br />if they would be allowed to keep the house in the <br />the pool, the garage and the concrete, the <br />the same spot as the pool. <br />.t location but that the foundation has been verified by <br />sound. <br />old and that there have been two additions put on <br />Leintz stated if the foundation and the basement floor are removed, it would cost another $80,000 and that <br />it would be difficult for the owners to break even on the property. <br />Leintz inquired whether the square footage would have to be reduced if the house were relocated. <br />McMillan stated it is her understanding the structural coverage is fine but that she has issues with adding <br />on to the existing residence. McMillan stated she would like to see the house moved further back. <br />White noted this house is in front of the other hu <br />massing would have an impact on the neighbors. <br />on the lake and that in his view the additional <br />PAGE O of 19 <br />