Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, l+'ebruary 12, 2007 <br />7:00, o'clock p.m. <br />(4. ` #06 -3231 Tf'ILLIAM S. DAMPIER, <br />Turner stated the original deck was considered <br />it would not be considered structural. <br />ITI'PLACE, Continued) <br />and was then revised and constructed in tiers so <br />Gaffron stated the bump -out was not part of the plans until 2005. <br />Dampier stated revising the deck was initially <br />Bremer stated she did recommend approval of tl <br />Commission and that she felt at that time the Cif <br />approving the application. Bremer noted the ap] <br />originally proposed and that she was in favor of <br />side yard setback and resulted in a large reducti( <br />hangs over a space, does not extend all the way <br />covered porch. <br />Bremer stated she was not aware of the issues wi <br />Planning Commission. Bremer commented that <br />building official to know exactly what the applici <br />Bremer stated the building official should not ha, <br />near future and that the applicant could go ahead <br />done a considerable amount of construction previ <br />he received the building permit. <br />and then later approved. <br />application in the fall when she was on the Planning <br />would be gaining two important concessions by <br />cant did reduce the size of the bump -out from what was <br />e application because it required abiding by the ten -foot <br />of the deck. Bremer pointed out this is a structure that <br />the ground, and would have the appearance of a <br />the building official at the time this was before the <br />ven his work load, it would be impossible for the <br />: was talking about with the cantilevered portion. <br />said that he would be issuing a building permit in the <br />.th the work. Bremer pointed out the applicant had <br />is to this and that he knew he should have waited until <br />Dampier stated in hindsight he regrets not waiting for the building permit but that he was anxious to get <br />started on the project and went ahead once he received verbal permission from the building official in <br />June. <br />Murphy stated everything that is already under <br />without the variance. <br />Dampier stated he is in need of additional <br />Murphy asked what would happen with the <br />Gaffron stated to his understanding the revised <br />original deck, but that he has not seen a revised <br />Murphy inquired whether the bump -out would be U <br />Gaffron stated it appears it would be. <br />Murphy inquired whether the amount of structural c <br />Gaffron stated you would need to add 58 square <br />172 square feet. <br />except the bump -out could be finished <br />space, which is the reason for the bump -out. <br />runoff if the bump -out were constructed. <br />and the bump -out would create less runoff than the <br />age plan. <br />for runoff than the original deck. <br />being requested is 114 square feet. <br />for the cantilever to the 114 square feet for a }total of <br />PAGE: 5 of 14 <br />