Laserfiche WebLink
C� <br />fl <br />u <br />• <br />ORONO CITY <br />Monday, <br />7:00 <br />(6. #07 -3258 BRUCE PADDOCK, 1450 -1 <br />Gaffron stated Exhibit 3B(2) shows the easement <br />easement past the northwest corner, of 1450. Gaf: <br />rather than a private outlot. Gaffron inquired wh( <br />cul -de -sac as private or public. <br />Stickney stated in his view the roadway is an e <br />26 feet wide if that is what the City's standards <br />Gaffron stated the City would probably maintain t <br />he would need-to speak with the public works dep <br />them to maintain this roadway. <br />Murphy stated in his opinion the public access <br />Stickney stated he would °prefer the roadway not <br />White stated in his view the roadway is an enhanc <br />stated he would like to see some type of trade -off <br />Murphy stated in his view this road is a dead -end a <br />doubtful there will ever be a public parking spot cr <br />and view the lake. <br />'ES OF THE <br />:OUNCIL MEETING <br />anuary 22, 2007 <br />'clock p.m. <br />BRA CKETTS POINT ROAD, Continued) <br />that to his knowledge the City does not maintain the <br />stated it should perhaps be platted as a public road <br />Stickney is considering the road all the way to the <br />.cement but that he does not want to make the road <br />for a public roadway. <br />roadway if it is constructed to city standards but that <br />ment on what width would be necessary to enable <br />at the northwest corner. <br />made public. <br />nent and does allow people to get in and out. White <br />the public access is eliminated. <br />does not lead to anything. Murphy stated it is <br />-d in this area that would allow people to sit there <br />McMillan stated the vacating of a public right -of -way deserves serious consideration and requires some <br />justification. McMillan indicated she is only aware of one instance where the City has vacated a public <br />right -of -way, and in that situation it was done for the public good. McMillan stated she sees some trade- <br />off with the removal of the hardcover under the new proposal but that in her view the right -of -way should <br />stay public. <br />Bremer stated she is in agreement with Council Member McMillan and Mayor White but that the Council <br />needs to be reasonable in its requirements and that she does not want to see a 22, 24 or 26 foot road in this <br />area. Bremer stated she would like to hear from the Public Works Department prior to making a decision <br />on the roadway. Bremer stated the removals in the 0 -75 foot zone are fabulous and that she likes the <br />relocation of the road, but if the public works department would like to see the roadway at 28 feet wide, <br />she might change her mind about leaving the roadway public. <br />Stickney stated if the right -of -way is widened to 30 feet, they should be able to get two cars to pass. <br />McMillan inquired what the width of the roadway is, currently. <br />Stickney indicated the current roadway has been 20 <br />Murphy stated in his view the Council would be de <br />reason to travel down this road is to look into the b� <br />with a wide public road in this area that essentially <br />would be out of character with the area. Murphy ea <br />create other issues for the residents in the neiahborl <br />for a number of years and has worked just fine. <br />:to in vacating -this public road and that the only <br />Murphy stated he is worried about winding up <br />one from the public will'utilize and a road that <br />;ssed a concern that a public road in this area would <br />PAGE'9 of 13 <br />