Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 23, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />6. 16-3532 CITY OF OROI\O, VARIANCE, PUBLIC HEARING <br />McMillan stated she walked the park on Sunday, and asked whether the Park Commission considered <br />having the small dog area to the right of the storm water pond. McMillan stated by relocating the small <br />dog area, it would eliminate the need to have a fence within another fence. <br />Meyers stated it might also take less fencing. <br />McMillan stated then it would not look like a fence inside of a fence. <br />Meyers stated the plan can be tinkered with but that the Park Commission would have to go back and <br />view the property. Meyers stated it is nice for the dogs to have a woodland experience as well as the open <br />area. <br />Levang stated that area might also have some shade. <br />Meyers stated the intent with the small dog park was to help preserve the prairie land. <br />Edwards stated the subject before the City Council now is the variance request for the fence and that <br />moving the small dog fence could be done if it is determined to be appropriate. Edwards indicated the <br />feedback he received from the Council, the Park Commission, and the Lurton family was to preserve <br />some of the prairie area. Edwards stated if that is not a concern, they can certainly redesign the fence. <br />McMillan stated in her view it would be more attractive to have the small dog section off to the right. <br />Meyers stated the Park Commission also formed a subcommittee prior to the Lurton approaching the <br />City and that they researched dog parks in a number of the surrounding areas. The committee's research <br />found that there is not excessive barking or other problems associated with a dog park. For people who <br />wish to visit the park, they will need to go through a permitting process and pay a fee. Meyers noted <br />Orono has 24 parks and that this park is underutilized. <br />McMillan stated she would like to hear from the public and then send this application to the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Loftus stated she can provide the agreement the City has with the Lurtons amending the uses of the park, <br />which was signed by someone representing the Lurton family and the Land Trust. <br />Dianna Milianta, 3515 Sixth Avenue North, stated she would like to read some excerpts irom an article <br />that appeared in the Lakeshore Weekly News published on October 31, 2011. The article talked about <br />how, as an avid animal lover, Susan Lurton enjoyed seeing them in their natural element. The following <br />is a quote from Phil Lurton, her husband: "We could see the property from our place and Sue did not <br />want development over there on that property because it was beautiful and she looked across the lake at it <br />all the time." Another quote from the article states that: "Sue's main thing was love for animal, said Bill. <br />That was part of the reason why she didn't want to see development, because of the animals who lived in <br />those areas, like deer and fox and whatever else we used to see. <br />Milianta stated just five years ago the Lurton family was talking about how this park was made for the <br />animals as Sue intended, but then the City decided to make a change and fence in the whole thing. <br />Page 12 of 23 <br />