Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 23, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />6. 16-3832 CITY OF ORONO, VARIANCE, PUBLIC HEARING (continued) <br />The property has not been surveyed and Staff is assuming that the property line is the edge of the wetland <br />and the edge of the lake, based on aerial photography and on site inspection. The fence would need to be <br />35 feet back from the wetland and 150 feet back from the lake, which would put the fence well into the <br />park. On the west side, the wetland extends like a finger into the park property. <br />The fence is proposed to be located almost adjacent to the wetland. The intent behind locating the <br />fencing this way is to accommodate the trails throughout the park as well as minimize visual impact of the <br />park from the lake and wetland. The fence is proposed to be located along the north and south property <br />lines. Those two sections of the fence do not require a variance. <br />The fence is proposed to contain the usable portion of the park for the park user while also maintaining <br />the goal of the ordinance, which is to preserve views into the property from the wetlands and from the <br />lake. Another goal is to maintain the existing vegetation. <br />Barnhart stated two variances are necessary. One variance is required for the lake yard setback and the <br />other variance is from the setback to the wetland. The proposed fence is a woven wire, 47 -inches in <br />height. The fence is intended to blend into the environment so it is not highly visible. <br />Levang stated she would also like to have Chair Meyers provide any comments he feels appropriate. <br />Rick Meyers, Park Chair, stated the Park Commission has been talking about this dog park for months <br />and that this is the plan that has been developed because it utilizes the land the best way for a dog park. <br />Meyers stated dog parks are a beneficial thing and that the Lurton family approached the City and <br />requested it become a dog park because they wanted to see more use of that park. Meyers indicated the <br />City is attempting to accommodate the Lurton family's wishes. <br />Meyers indicated the Park Commission held some meetings with the family and they requested the City <br />go forward with the dog park. The dog park has also been discussed at the Park Commission meetings as <br />well as at the City Council level. Meyers stated there either appears to be some objection against the <br />whole idea of a dog park or else regarding the location of the fence. Meyers stated the City Council will <br />hear the residents' comments and go from there. <br />Meyers stated this item can go to the Planning Commission and the residents can have the discussion with <br />them and then it will come back to the City Council. Meyers noted the Park Commission is also an <br />advisory board, and that as a Park Commission, they decided there was a need for a dog park. <br />Meyers commented this is a great piece of property and that having a park by someone's house raises the <br />adjoining properties' value by $5,000 apiece. Meyers stated dog parks are very popular and are an <br />amenity that many surrounding communities are currently doing. The Park Commission felt it was a <br />good idea, the right property, and the right time to move forward. Meyers stated the City Council <br />concurred with the need for a dog park and are ready to move forward with it. <br />Page 11 of 23 <br />