Laserfiche WebLink
MIN_ ,TES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY,, OUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 27, 2008 <br />• 7:00,I 'clock p.m. <br />• <br />17-1 <br />*7. POLICE OFFICER HIRING <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to approv <br />Step One of the L.E.L.S. Local #40 Contract, <br />Dahl as she was the top candidate. VOTE: <br />*8. APPOINTMENT OF 2008 GOLF <br />Murphy moved, Bremer seconded, to approi <br />position with the Golf Course, effective June <br />applicable provisions of the PERA rules. V( <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />Mattick reported on the state aid issue, noting th <br />comments made at the prescreening board level,' <br />Orono can keep the current amount of funding m <br />streets. If the City chooses not to assume the pri <br />approximately $50,000 this year, and a $250,00( <br />Staff has not calculated the costs to assume the s <br />their recommendation, Mn/DOT would then typ <br />the hiring of Maureen Riverdahl and Erick Dyer at <br />rhich is $21.07 per hour. Riverdahl will be senior to <br />,es 5, Nays 0. <br />EMPLOYEE <br />the appointment of Thomas Baurle to a seasonal <br />, 2008, at a pay rate of $8.00 per hour under the <br />CE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />screening board meets tomorrow. Based on <br />t is likely the screening board will authorize that <br />th no penalty subject to the City assuming all private <br />rate streets, the state aid would be decreased by <br />penalty would be assessed for the past five years. <br />reets. Mattick stated once the screening board makes <br />;ally approve the recommendation. <br />Murphy stated Staff should ,calculate the costs td not assume the private streets as well as the costs to <br />assume the private streets. Murphy asked how Mn/DOT justifies going back five years as opposed to <br />three years versus some other number of years. Murphy stated in his view this should be looked at <br />state -wide to see whether other cities categorize their streets the same way. <br />l <br />Mattick stated he is unaware of any rule that staff <br />opposes the finding, Mn/DOT may take the posi <br />penny Mn/DOT feels has been overpaid. In the <br />gone back five years. I <br />Murphy stated in his view the City should fight <br />Mattick stated the City of Minnetonka did ind: <br />roads but that they do not count those roads in <br />how many years they can go back and that if the City <br />n that they are entitled to be compensated for every <br />;t, on other funding issues, Mn/DOT has typically <br />issue. <br />to the screening board that they also have private <br />state aid calculation. <br />McMillan stated it was her understanding there was some documentation from the screening board <br />stating that they would not go back in the past and penalize the city. <br />Mattick.stated they are not looking to go back a, <br />screening board and the City assumes full contrc <br />the City has reserved jurisdiction of the private r <br />i <br />Murphy recommended the City Council look at i <br />options and then make a decision. <br />long as the City adopts the recommendation of the <br />I over the private roads. Mattick stated in his opinion <br />)ads in their agreements. <br />the options and the costs associated with those <br />PAGE 9 of 12 <br />