Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Tuesday, May 27, 2008 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />(CITYATTORNEY'S REPORT, Continued) <br />Mattick reported there is a resident who will be applying for a residential kennel license that is <br />somewhat unique in that she does not yet live in the city. Mattick noted in the past the City has only <br />approved licenses and permits for city residents. This person is waiting to purchase the property to <br />know whether the permit will be approved by the City. They have estimated that they can accommodate <br />ten dogs on the 23 -acre parcel. iMe entire lower level of the residence will be turned into a <br />kennel/living area for the dogs. <br />Bremer stated she is familiar with this person and that she has done a tremendous amount of work for <br />dogs in general. Bremer indicated generally speaking she would be supportive of this license if the <br />neighbors are informed of the permit application and that some conditions should be placed on the <br />permit. Bremer stated a large number of the dogs would be sick and elderly, would not be outside a <br />great deal of time, and that there is quite a bit of turnover in the dogs given their age. <br />McMillan asked what the normal process is for kernel license. <br />Mattick stated typically the person would already own a residence in the city and would then make <br />application to the city. Mattick stated he did speak with the person and that she has indicated the dogs <br />would primarily be kept indoors. The person has also indicated that she has taken steps to speak with <br />the neighbors and that it is her intent to create a roaming area, which would not be located next to the <br />neighbors. <br />Mattick stated the first issue is whether Staff can accept the application from a nonresident because the • <br />license goes to the person and not the property. <br />White stated the license would need to be conditioned on her becoming a resident. <br />Mattick stated the person would also like to be approved for 12 dogs and that the application will likely <br />be before the Council at the next council meeting. <br />Bremer, asked whether Staff is familiar with a license being considered by the Council that was <br />submitted by a nonresident. <br />Gaffron indicated he is not aware of any such application. <br />Murphy indicated he had recommended to City staff that the City Attorney become involved in this <br />matter given the legal background of the person interested in applying. <br />Mattick indicated he raised the issue because he was looking for direction from the Council on how <br />many dogs would be allowed and whether a nonresident can apply for this type of license. <br />White recommended the City learn from what happened up in the Hugo area and develop guidelines on <br />who cleans up the debris, et cetera, following a disaster of that magnitude. ` <br />McMillan asked what the status is on the joint powers agreement for police protection during the <br />Republican Convention. • <br />PAGE 10 of 12 <br />