Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />TES OF THE <br />ORONO CIT 1 COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, February 25, 2008 <br />7:OO�o'clock p.m. <br />*11. LIQUIDATION OF COMMUNITY <br />McMillan moved, Rahn seconded, to approN <br />#2FTX18L61CA20352, through a sealed bid <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br />Attorney Mattick noted a letter has been rece <br />roads and that the City Administrator has drE <br />Council have one more meeting with represe <br />issue and whether it can be resolved in some <br />Mattick stated it is his understanding the S <br />City Council decide who should attend the <br />least one other council member. <br />Mattick stated following his review of the mater <br />MnDOT has focused on the issue relating to the <br />City's roads are termed private roads. Mattick n <br />and that he has been unable to find any case law <br />this situation. Mattick noted MnDOT is require( <br />govern the process, and within those rules is a de <br />is under the City's jurisdiction is considered a cii <br />jurisdiction over all of their private roads within <br />issue needs to be discussed further. <br />Murphy asked which MnDOT representatives <br />Mattick stated the primary person the City has <br />she is not the ultimate decider of the issue. <br />Murphy stated he is in favor of sitting down witl <br />are a large number of people at MnDOT who rel <br />people that actually make the policies. Murphy <br />Senator Gen Olson and that he would recommen <br />transpired and then discuss this issue thoroughly <br />White indicated he is in favor of meeting with M <br />Olson. <br />Moorse noted the City is not aware of when the s <br />find out that information. <br />Murphy stated the definition of city streets and <br />Bremer indicated she also is in agreement with <br />VICE OFFICER VEHICLE <br />the sale of a 2001 Ford F -150, VIN <br />rocess, with the minimum bid being $4,500.00. <br />from MnDOT regarding the classification of Orono's <br />a letter in response to that. Mattick suggested the City <br />ves of MnDOT to see exactly where they stand on this <br />ion prior to sending any letter. <br />Board meets May 28"' or 29th, and suggested the . <br />Mattick suggested the Mayor attend along with at <br />tls concerning this issue, it is his impression that <br />alculation of city streets and the fact that some of the <br />ted there is no definition of city streets in the statutes <br />lealing with the definition of a city street as it relates to <br />by the applicable statute to produce rules on how to <br />inition on city streets. The rule says any street which <br />� street. Mattick noted the City has retained <br />heir easement documents and that in his opinion this <br />is suggesting the City meet with. <br />discussing this issue with is Julie Skallman but that <br />MnDOT before sending another letter but that there <br />)rt directly to the Commissioner and only a handful of <br />►dicated he has previously discussed this issue with <br />. the City develop a list of bullet points of what has <br />vith Senator Olson. <br />and also with discussing the issue with Senator <br />subcommittee is meeting and they will need to <br />it relates to funding should also be discussed. <br />recommendation of Attorney Mattick. <br />PAGE 11 of 12 <br />