Laserfiche WebLink
f <br /> � ,I • <br /> ' MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, September 17,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> , <br /> ; <br /> (#07-3315 Donna and Michael Ebertz, Continued) <br /> � <br /> , _ Berg indicated she also does not have a concern with the shed. <br /> Curtis noted the code provides for a lockbox four feet high in the 0-75 foot area and to herrecollection the <br /> shed is in some state of disrepair. - � . ' <br /> � Ebertz stated they store their lawnmower, snowmobile, and Weed whacker in the shed. <br /> Kang stated she has reservations about removing the trees in order to straighten the driveway out and that <br /> she might be more in favor of leaving the driveway as is. � � <br /> Zullo stated if the shed is in a state of disrepair, she would not want the shed to be rebuilt, and that <br /> perhaps some space could be allocated for storage of equipment in the four-car garage. <br /> Gaffron asked if the overhangs to the south are encroaching over the 75 foot line. Gaffron noted City <br /> Code allows 1.5 foot overhangs. ' � <br /> ;f <br /> Ebertz indicated they would like their application to,�'move forward as quickly as possible so they are able <br /> to start construction prior to winter. Ebertz noted they are reducing the hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone to <br /> the bare minimum and that he would like to retain the office/study since he does a great deal of work out <br /> of his house. Ebertz stated that area of the house is very well shielded and that their plan allows the house <br /> to be very functiorial. <br /> Berg noted the City's Code dictates what can and cannot be allowed in certain zones. <br /> Zullo sta.ted in her view the office/study could be designed so it does not encroach,but that she would be <br /> in favor of the environmental enhancements to the pr;operty. Zullo stated if the shed is in disrepair, she <br /> would like to see it removed. � <br /> � <br /> Sharratt stated they do not have the ability to construi t a basement on this lot and that mechanical type of <br /> equipment is required to be on the first and second floors of the house. <br /> , <br /> Berg commented the shed would not complement th�new house. <br /> � <br /> Mrs. Ebertz commented that the shed is very well shielded. <br /> I <br /> Zullo stated she would prefer the driveway not be reconfigured to reduce the hardcover, and suggested the <br /> size of the rooms be changed to comply with the 75-foot average lakeshore setback. Zullo noted the <br /> Commissioners are giving their personal opinions on what could be done to make the house more <br /> conformity and that it is the choice of the applicant ori what options he would like to pursue. <br /> � <br /> Sharratt stated it is not alwa s that eas to redesi � <br /> y y gn a plan and that the revisions do require a fair amount <br /> of work. •' <br /> •� <br /> � <br /> , <br /> Berg recommended the plans comply as much as possible with City Code. Berg stated due to the <br /> revisions that are required,it is probably necessary to table the application. <br /> PAGE 7 <br /> � <br />