My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 2:13:35 PM
Creation date
7/16/2012 1:56:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TAE `' <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMNIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday, September 17,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#07-3315 Donna and Michael Ebertz, Continued) " ° <br /> 'Ebertz stated the shed is not visible from the lake,is screened on all four sides by trees,and that he stores � � <br /> his yard equipment iri it: Ebertz indicated he would like to retain the shed since.it�dnes provide a very <br /> functional use for storage of his eguipment. - <br /> Kang asked what.rooms are located off of the patios. <br /> Sharratt stated the patio on the south side is off of a study,the patio off of the southeast corner is off of <br /> living space, and the patio in the back is off of the kitchen. Sharratt noted the patios are rather small and <br /> are approximately 10 x 12 or 16. <br /> Acting Chair Berg opened the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. <br /> There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Acting Chair Berg closed the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. <br /> Rice stated in her opinion there are some design issues that could be addressed to bring the house further <br /> into compliance. <br /> Kang concurred with Commissioner Rice and that she would like to see the of�ce/study brought more <br /> into conformity. <br /> Sharratt stated they can look at redesigning the house slightly and they can remove the walkway around <br /> the bay as well as square off the bay window. Sharratt asked whether they would be allowed anything on <br /> that setback line. Sharratt noted they were told at a different Planning Commission meeting that they <br /> would not be opposed to an encroachment in that area since it is so well concealed. <br /> Rice commented she understands this is a tough lot but that changes to the design would help bring the <br /> house more into conformance. <br /> Zullo sta.ted she does not find the need for a variance to encroach into the setback given the size of the <br /> house. , <br /> Berg stated if the walkway was eliminated and the bay window is squared,they would eliminate the <br /> majority of the hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone. <br /> Sharratt pointed out there is a small amount of rip-rap in that area. <br /> Turner noted the patio has a covered roof. <br /> Berg asked if the rip-rap would need to remain. <br /> Curtis stated it would and that calculations from a previous application show there is approximately 134 <br /> square feet of hardcover. <br /> Kang stated she does not have a concern with the shed. <br /> PAGE 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.