Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> ' f � <br /> I <br /> I <br /> Curtis noted Exhibit D to the Planner's Report ill�strates the existing hardcover on the lot. <br /> Kempf stated this is definitely a hardship lot and noted that cunent structural coverage is at 13 percent. <br /> Kempf stated he does not perceive that the expansions would negatively impact the view of the <br /> neighbors. Kempf inquired whether what the height of the new roof would be. <br /> . i <br /> Curtis stated the highest point of the roof would be at 29 feet. <br /> Kempf commented he likes the step-down of the��ofline to help reduce the massing of the structure and <br /> that he does not see the addition toward the garage�end of the property as adding considerably to the <br /> � <br /> , <br /> � . <br /> . (#07-3305 James Zimmerman,2745 Shadywood,IRoad, Continued) , <br /> massing. Kempf expressed concerns regarding theladdition toward the pomt as givmg the appearance of <br /> a substantial amount of massing. �I <br /> i <br /> Curtis stated there may be a possibility that during construction the house would be cut down to the cap <br /> and would be rebuilt. Curtis inquired whether the Planning Commission has any concerns if this <br /> becomes a part of the project. <br /> Jacobson stated they are attempting to come up with a plan for adding to the house and that they have <br /> not thought about aspect. Jacobson stated he did no think about removing the house down to the cap. <br /> � <br /> Kroeger asked if the house is on a slab. ! � � <br /> . � <br /> Graten stated it is a slab on grade. '� <br /> i <br /> Curtis stated she wanted to bring that issue up so that all the parties would be aware of it. <br /> .'� <br /> � <br /> Jacobson stated as part of the next step they would be�looking at that more closely. <br /> , ��Winer stated she would be in agreement with sticking`�more closely to the existing patio slab. <br /> Kroeger stated his understanding of the hardship citedlby the property owners is the need to upgrade the <br /> � house to fit in more with the neighborhood. � ' . <br /> Graten stated that is a portion of the hardship but that there is a large portion of hardcover dedicated to <br /> the turnaround,which makes it•difficult to build on the lot without doing a lot of modification to the <br /> . driveway in exchange for the new hardcover. , j <br /> i <br /> Kempf stated the properly owner has reasonable use of�the property currently but that what is being <br /> proposed for this lot in this neighborhood is not excessive. <br /> i . <br /> �Jacobson commented it is di�cult to define what reasonable use is for every person and that how a <br /> house fits into a neighborhood should be taken into account. Jacobson noted they are also proposing to - <br /> � make improvements to the lot to address environmental4 issues relating to the lake. <br /> l+ <br /> Kroeger indicated he is in agreement with the comments made earlier by Chair Kempf on the visual <br /> impact of the expansions from different points on the lot and that he would like to see the expansion <br /> toward the point be modified. I <br /> ! <br /> . I <br /> I <br />