My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
10-15-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 2:13:35 PM
Creation date
7/16/2012 1:56:27 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
418
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, ,. <br /> Curtis stated she did attempt to get that statement by the city attorney clarified but that it was his � <br /> understanding he did not feel the easement had any impact on the ability to build on the lot. <br /> Jacobson reiterated that in his view the private easement does have some impact,with the easement <br /> being given to allow for turnaround in the event of an emergency. Jacobson stated they are attempting <br /> to keep the hardcover at the current level and that they are here to obtain some guidance from the <br /> Planning Commission on the driveway. . <br /> Chair Kempf opened the public hearing at 7:58 p.m. <br /> Thomas Rabdgaard,2765 Shadywood Road, stated he is basically here to see what is allowed on this lot <br /> because he is considering rebuilding on his lot. <br /> (#07-3305 James Zimmerman,2745 Shadywood Road,Continued) <br /> Chair Kempf closed the public hearing at 7:59 p.m. <br /> Kempf concurred that this is a hardship lot. <br /> Kroeger asked if the easement would affect options three and four. <br /> Graten stated it would affect option four and the easement may have to be renegotiated. <br /> � Curtis�concurred that the easement issue would need to be clarified and that she would be speaking with <br /> the City Attorney again on that issue. <br /> Kroeger stated the applicant is proposing to add approximately 1200 square feet of hardcover. <br /> Kroeger noted a number of letters were received requesting that the boat house be allowed to remain. � <br /> Graten stated if the boat house is removed,the properly owner would be allowed to have a dock and a <br /> boat and jet skis parked out there,.and given the aesthetics,the property owner, along with the <br /> neighbors,would prefer the boat house. <br /> � <br /> Kempf stated he would prefer the boathouse. � <br /> Rice stated she is undecided about the application since the property owner has reasonable use of the <br /> property currently. <br /> Winer inguired whether there is a homeowners association for this neighborhood and whether the <br /> homeowners association owns the easement. <br /> Graten stated he is unsure at this time who has ownership of the easement. <br /> Curtis indicated Staff would look into that issue. <br /> Kempf inyuired whether the proposed additions are all over existing hardcover. <br /> Graten stated portions of the project are over existing hardcover. Graten demonstrated on the overhead <br /> the portions of the project that would be constructed over existing hardcover. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.