Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> • { <br /> !Y <br /> " MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,September 17,2007 <br /> 6:00 0'�lock p.m. <br /> ,� <br /> (#07-3318 Anders Holm,continued) ! <br /> I <br /> Berg opened the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. � <br /> t <br /> There were no public comments concerning this application. <br /> Berg closed the public hearing at 8:37 p.m. ` <br /> . � <br /> Zullo inquired what the distance is between the existing septic tank and the proposed addition. <br /> Turner stated they are at 12 and it could be 10 feet. Turner noted those locations were confirmed in the <br /> field this week. R <br /> i <br /> Holm stated the south property line is fairly wooded and would help to screen the addition. <br /> � <br /> Otto indicated the trees along the south properly line are mainly pine trees that were planted <br /> approximately 15 years aga `� <br /> Zullo inquired what property the trees are on. <br /> ,k <br /> Otto stated there was not a survey performed at the time his parents purchased the property back in the <br /> 1950s and that there is some misunderstanding about where the exact property lines are. The nursery that <br /> was adjoining this lot at one time constructed a fence tliat they had assumed was along the property line. <br /> Otto stated the trees may or may not be on his property;and that the shed is located partially on the other <br /> . property. . <br /> Holm noted the shed has been relocated to be entirely on Mr. Otto's properiy. <br /> � <br /> M <br /> Turner stated the survey was done at the time the other addition was constructed,but it does depict the <br /> accurate location of the house. s <br /> �1 <br /> t <br /> 1 <br /> Zullo inquired whether the trees would be maintained in:,the years to come. . <br /> _, � <br /> Otto stated they would be,with evergreen trees being added to the south and to the west. <br /> I <br /> Zullo inquired whether the addition could be relocated back two feet. <br /> � <br /> Otto stated if the addition is moved further back,it would block the view from the house of people <br /> approaching the residence. Otto indicated the addition is;required to accommodate a larger family. <br /> Holm commented the angle of the house on the property also limits their options on the location of the <br /> addition. � <br /> .� <br /> Kang stated she is having a difficult time understanding what the hardship is but that she understands the <br /> rationale of the applicant. � <br /> :� <br /> Berg asked whether the addition should be reduced. '� <br /> � <br /> '.� <br /> PAGE 17,! <br />