Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ' <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMIVIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,September 17,2007 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 7. #07-3318 ANDERS HOLM ON BEHALF OF STEPHEN OTTO,2185 WATERTOWN <br /> ROAD,VARIANCE,8:28 P.M.—8:50 P.M. <br /> Anders Holm,Architect, and Stephen Otto,Applicant, were present. <br /> Turner stated the applicant is requesting a setback variance to construct an addition to the house as close <br /> as 20 feet from the south property line when a 50-foot setback is required. The original house was -. <br /> constructed in approximately 1920. In 1997, a section of the house was removed and replaced by an <br /> attached garage and mudroom, a three-season porch,and a two-story area containing two bedrooms <br /> upstairs and a kitchen/dining room,entry and den downstairs. The remaining section of the house was <br /> converted to a great room and master bedroom with a craft room in the half-story above. <br /> The proposed two-story addition has a 20-foot setback and would contain a family room on the first floor <br /> and a master suite on the second level. The existing master bedroom would be converted to a library. <br /> The existing house sits at an angle to the rear property line. The southeast corner of the house is about 70 <br /> feet from this properly line,with the southwest corner being 35.4 feet. The northwest corner is <br /> approximately 53 feet from the property line. The proposed addition would be 18 feet wide and 38 feet <br /> long. <br /> Turner requested the Planning Commission discuss the following issues: . . <br /> 1. Would not having the larger master suite and family room be an undue hardship and is it required <br /> to make reasonable use of the property. <br /> 2. Is the addition the appropriate size or should it be smaller. <br /> 3. Could the addition be placed in a conforming location or a more conforming location. The <br /> minimum setback to the septic. <br /> If the Commission determines the addition is appropriate and necessary,Planning Staff recommends <br /> approval of a setback variance to allow the addition with a 3.5 foot offset conditioned on maintenance of <br /> the wooded area along the south property line through a conservation easement. <br /> Holm indicated they did look at a number of options for adding on to the house,with their options being <br /> limited due to the impact on the view from the house,the location of an old septic site, and the setbacks to <br /> the south and east. There is some question regarding which side is the front side of the property and that <br /> the survey shows the south side of the property as the back. Holm stated it is debatable whether a 50-foot <br /> setback is required for the south side. <br /> The property owner is requesting an eight-foot offset for the addition,which has to do with access to <br /> walkways and the ability to have a view. <br /> Berg inquired what the size of the addition is. � <br /> Holm stated it is 18' x 30' and would consist of 1,938 square feet. Holm commented the addition would <br /> help bring the house up to the standards of the neighborhood. <br /> PAGE 16 <br />