My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
08-20-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 11:14:34 AM
Creation date
7/16/2012 11:14:16 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
311
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�•' r <br /> � O� <br /> O ;` O <br /> ��s :� CITY of UR4N0 <br /> � ���� � <br /> �i , G RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L <br /> L�kES80�� NO. 5 4 8 S . <br /> 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at public hearin�s held on <br /> May 15, June 19, and July 17, 2006 and recommended approval of variances <br /> � based on the following findings: <br /> a. The property contains 19,572 s.f. in area and has 60' in width. <br /> b. The lot is substandard in area and width and a residence has e:cisted on the <br /> property for many years. � <br /> c. There is no additional land available to bring the lot �vidth or lot area into <br /> conformity. <br /> d. The hardcover variances as requested are in line with the levels of hardcover <br /> variances approved on rebuild applications with similar lot conditions. The <br /> proposed residence meets the structural lot coverage limitation of 15%. <br /> e. The proposed structure complies with all lake yard, sidz yard, rear (street) <br /> yard, and average lakeshore setback requirements. <br /> f. The steepness and narrowness of the driveway warrants an additional 100 s.f. <br /> of paved area near the street to allow for safer ingress and egress. <br /> 4. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by <br /> the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, <br /> safety and welfare of the community. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; <br /> and �vould be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and <br /> Comprehensive Plan of the City. <br /> Page2of� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.