My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
03-19-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 4:41:09 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 4:40:41 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
529
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MIlVUTES OF THE . <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMIVIISSION � � <br /> Tuesday,February 20,2007 . <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> � (#07-3250 Philip Carlson,Continued) <br /> Kroeger inquired whether the plantings would all be located on the Amber Woods site. � <br /> Shopek stated all the plantings would be located on the Amber Woods site. <br /> � Rahn stated the applicants have adequately addressed his concerns. Rahn inquired whether the <br /> �applicants have any samples of the building materials. <br /> Carlson stated she did not bring along samples but displayed a colored rendition of one�of the units. <br /> Carlson stated all of the units would be constructed of the same materials. <br /> . Kempf stated in his opinion the rock surface would be a better choice. Kempf inquired whether the <br /> . area by the sign located below the entry driveway would be surrounded by trees. <br /> Carlson indicated there would be three deciduous trees planted in that area which are located further <br /> away from the sign that what is depicted and that the trees would also be higher than the sign. <br /> • Shopek stated they would add some screening along the wall. <br /> Kroeger noted a neighbor had requested at the previous meeting that the hill not be tampered with. <br /> . Kempf noted the applicants are using up almost all of their signage allotment with the monument sign, <br /> which would only leave approximately one square foot of signage on each building. Kempf suggested <br /> the applicants consider revising the size of the signage on each of the buildings. � <br /> Cazlson stated the end part of the monument is really a column with a light on top and that she is not <br /> consi`denng at as part o eir signage a o�nen�earlson state�lc-they were plaiuurigon�umberin <br /> the buildings rather than having a big sign denoting the business on each building. <br /> Kempf inquired whether Staff is oka.y with that type of signage on the buildings. <br /> Curtis stated that is fine. � <br /> Zullo inquired whether there are any issues with the drainage since the elevation has been lowered. <br /> Gaffron stated the City Engineer did not specify any particular drainage and/or grading issues and that � <br /> he does not anticipate any problems with the drainage. Gaffron stated the entire parldng lot drains to a <br /> storm sewer system. � <br /> Zullo inquired whether there are any concerns with drainage along the back of the retaining walls. <br /> Gaffron sta.ted that is a gradual slope. . <br /> PAGE 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.