My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
01-16-2007 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 3:27:26 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 3:26:59 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
428
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i <br /> �- <br /> #07-3250 <br /> `` � January 1Y,2007 <br /> ,,. Page 3 of 12 <br /> .Background � � <br /> The property was part of a 7-acre tract that was platted into two lots for development in 2001. <br /> � The easterly lot (Lot 2@ 4.5 acres) was rezoned to RPUD and is now the site of Orono Woods <br /> Senior Housing. The west 2.6 acres became Lot 1, Orono Ambar, a.nd was rezoned to B-6 PUD, � <br /> Highway Commercial District. Lot 1 is the subject of the curreiit application. <br /> Off'ice Use Approved in 2001. Developinent by Frank Dunbar of a 25,000 s.f. 2-story office <br /> building with surface and tulderground parking on Lot 1 was granted General Development Plan <br /> Approval in 2001, subject to the provisions of Planned Uiut Developnient Agreement No. 2A. <br /> Permitted uses of that building were general office uses including business and professional <br /> offices of a general natlue, and inchiding a clinic for human care on an outpatient basis. The <br /> building could not be used for general retail use, but accessory retail uses could occur in up to <br /> 20% of the gross floor area of the building. - <br /> Seiuor Housin�Phase II. Duiibar subsequently concluded that there was iiisu.fficient demand for <br /> -the office building, and in March 2002 proposed a 50-unit Phase II of Orono Woods Senior <br /> Housing for Lot 1. That application resulted in a public liearing during which the adjoining <br /> residential neighbors expressed significant opposition to the project based on the size, orientation <br /> and intensity of the proposal. Dunbar did not proceed with that application and sold the <br /> property. � <br /> Initial Office Condo Proposal. Ravia Real Estate in spring 2003 proposed an office-condo <br /> development on the site, with a site layout that included buildings with south and east-facing � <br /> walkouts. While that plan was generally looked upoii favorably by the Planning Commission and <br /> Council, the applicants ultimately concluded they could.not reduce the ntunber of units or square <br /> footage in order to meet the parkuzg sta11 minimums established for their proposed use. Ravia <br /> withdrew their application in summer 2003. <br /> Amber Woods Office Centre. In December 2004 I�iterspace West filed application #OS-3080, � <br /> proposing to construct an office condo development on the site, with surface parking. That <br /> application resulted in General Concept Plan Approval (Resolution No. 5296) in Maxch 2005 for <br /> five 2-unit, 1-1/2 story waikout office condo buildings. The applicants worked through spring <br /> and surmner 2005 to produce detailed plans, and had discussions with the City (at fihe City's <br /> request) regarding changing access to the site based on new information about future access <br /> points along Highway 12. Applica.iits ultimately chose to not make the suggested revisions to <br /> tlleir plaiis. <br /> On October 10, 2005 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 5387 which conditionally granted <br /> the applicants General ,Development Plan approval, Commercial Site Plan approval, and <br /> Preliminary aild Final Plat approval for the "Aniber Woods Office Centre". While it was <br /> unusual to grant preliminary and final plat approvals on the same day in the same resolution, the <br /> applicants expressed a need to move quickly. Those approvals were conditioned on tinlely <br /> submittal of required documents, fees, other agency pernlits, etc. The Resohition indicated that <br /> all approvals would eapire if the plat was not filed by April 10, 2006 (per City ordinances, final , <br /> plat approval is effective for six inonths). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.