My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/20/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
11/20/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 2:53:26 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:53:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF T1�E <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> Monday,November 20,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3239 VOGUE ICF HOMES,CONTINUED) <br /> Vogstrom stated they would look at that as well. <br /> Kempf stated some different color banding on a tall structure also helps to change the appearance of a <br /> structure. <br /> Bremer opened the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. <br /> Barry Bennett,2208 Shadywood Road, stated he has always welcomed new development in his <br /> neighborhood,but that he has a concern with the increase in hardcover on the lot. Bennett stated since the <br /> house across the street was constructed,he has experienced a considerable amount of runoff into his yard <br /> and that he has a concern regarding the runoff he would experience in his shoreline yard and into the lake <br /> as a result of this project. � <br /> Bennett stated the current house is not a walkout and that the rooflines would also change under this <br /> design,which would bring a significant amount of water runoff toward his property. Bennett pointed out <br /> there would be a raised walkway in the area between the house and his property,which will also increase <br /> the runoff towards his lot. The new residence would be located closer to his house. � <br /> Bennett noted the comments from the City Engineer state that the engineered retaining wall design should <br /> be submitted for approval if it exceeds four feet in height and that this retaining wall appears to be over <br /> four feet. <br /> Bennett expressed a concern regarding the height of this structure and that if this proposal is approved,he <br /> would have two high structures on either side of his residence. Bennett reiterated his concerns regarding <br /> the amount of hardcover being proposed for this lot and the potential runoff to his property and the lake. <br /> Bremer requested clarification from Staff concerning the drainage proposed for this site. <br /> Turner stated the applicant did respond to some preliminary comments of the City Engineer by creating a <br /> swale and that the erosion and sediment details are usually done during construction. Turner stated the <br /> regulation of hardcover is for protection of the lake and suggested the City review the drainage problems <br /> that the neighbor is currently experiencing. Turner stated the swales should divert the water away from <br /> the Bennett property. <br /> Rahn noted the City Engineer typically approves the final grading plan and that the City could make a <br /> requirement that the lot be surveyed following completion of the project. , <br />• Gaffron pointed out the neighbor's concerns were regarding increased runoff into his lakeshore yard but <br /> that typically drainage and grading plans do not deal with what happens to the runoff in the 0-75 foot <br /> � zone. Gaffron stated he does not lrnow how the City would resolve the fact that more water is being <br /> diverted into the 0-75 foot area. Gaffron stated the grading for this specific proposal probably cannot be <br /> changed to resolve the neighbor's water problems. <br /> PAGE 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.