My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
07/17/2006 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2012 2:49:24 PM
Creation date
6/19/2012 2:49:20 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIl�TUTES OF THE � <br /> ORONO PLANIVING CONIlVIISSION <br /> Monday,July 17,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#06-3180 William Ulrich,Continued) <br /> 7urgens expressed a concern regarding the impact on the water,noting that there are two four-inch pipes <br /> and one eight-inch pipe that would drain into the lake rather than being mitigated elsewhere on the site. <br /> Jurgens stated if this were a new property,this addition would not be allowed. <br /> Berg recommended a rain garden be required to help filter the water. <br /> Schmitt noted they are under the allowable hardcover. <br /> Berg stated due to the size of the addition,it is reasonable for the Planning Commission to require a rain <br /> garden. • <br /> Schxnitt coxnmented there is plenty of natural vegetation in the area that helps filter the water. <br /> Jurgens stated given the size of the structure,he would also like to see some landscaping. <br /> Kempf stated in his view the size of the addition is excessive and that he would like to see a smaller <br /> addition constructed with a rain garden added. <br /> Jurgens noted the owner acquired the property in 2005 and that the properiy owner should have done � � <br /> some due diligence on what is allowed and not allowed on the properiy prior to purchase. <br /> Kroeger commented the size of the house is not out ofline with the rest of the neighborhood. , <br /> Schmitt stated the house is located virtually in some woods but that they would be agreeable to planting <br /> some additional trees on the north side of the septic site. <br /> Kroeger stated the issue is the impact on the lake and the views from the houses on the other side of the <br /> lake. <br /> Jurgens stated he would like to see some trees planted on the side of the house facing the lake. <br /> Kroeger stated he would be in favor of the size of the addition subject to the rain garden and some <br /> landscaping. <br /> Bremer commented she would like to see a smaller addition. <br /> Berg inquired what size the addition should be reduced to. <br /> Kempf stated in his view a garage stall smaller would be the minimum reduction in the size. <br /> Jurgens stated he has a difficult time saying how much the structure should be reduced by when it could _ <br /> be designed in a different way that would lessen the impact on the lake and on the views across the lake. <br /> PAGE 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.