Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3244 <br /> - November 20,2006 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> 2. Prior to last year a house had existed on ihe property since 1958. <br /> 3. There is no adjacent property the�pplic�uit could acquire to enlarge the lot. <br /> 4. There are iiumerous lots with houses iii the inui�ediate vicuiity of tlus property that <br /> are of similar size so the proposed liouse would ilot be out of cliaracter with the <br /> si�rrounding area. <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> Are there any other issues or concerns with tlus application? <br /> Staff Recommend�tion <br /> Plaimuig Staff reconuiiends approval of the lot area variance subject to the graciing and site <br /> plaiis beiiig revised to adclress the issues outlined in the City Engiiieer's repoi-t, aiid that no <br /> other variances axe granted for redevelopment of the property. <br /> , <br />