|
.
<br /> �. .
<br /> significantly,which would cause the applicant to lose even more time. R1hn inquired whether the City
<br /> Engineer has had an opportunity to review the cevised plans. }
<br /> 3ka�
<br /> Curtis stated to her knowledge the city engineer has not reviewedtthe rev�sed plans.
<br /> ,_-��x�� �ra���,
<br /> tY f,- ��tf Y¢5v f(,�,�t� T�`x
<br /> e �i f 'C1'�lRi{ i,c�V��l`s
<br /> Kroeger eapressed doubt that the City Council would approve 4l percent l�ardcover foi th�s lot.
<br /> 'tF}3it�&�s; u`°+��F�'������a���ls��k�
<br /> ��`�,��-,�r�'�- .r��� V��diN'ti��'1��i.���°'�r �`�t
<br /> . Kempf concurred that the City Engineer should review the plbans�rio`r�to tlie City Council'rev�ewing it.
<br /> � *"''+�� ��r�YJ hSyj Yi'lYkS.�- �'�< `n":���.cr�t�*"r'K7'�ti�r�.��?.
<br /> yf��.
<br /> . ��#^��4`fi-'pi�6 .�d t*�:.i'�:�•• � _ ��,:'Ir F v.n�z 4'a.€s
<br /> r �,� 3 �A �y1�sx ",v,,tf iti?;.t�} r#���;�
<br /> Hessburg stated he is agi•eeable fio working with the C�ty�nguieer � ��,�„�fi,f�y�,,
<br /> �#y,�' tT`, �?����p���4 �c,,;C�.�r>:
<br /> ��:�C5�� I�.��iy�S�\
<br /> �'^'' rr' '. 3�
<br /> Bremer stated the problem the Planning Commission has��vifh tlie appl�cat�on is that there are a number of
<br /> .a.P.t �*�'3`t��"C���t �_
<br /> '4>
<br /> issues that have not been finalized, such as the drainage and the hardcovet and tliat these issues should be
<br /> x�'�l�l,�l St�z�3+�t�4Lk�i�t t'�`'it ➢n. K;'%�' .
<br /> Rs���n+-�T��E��`'T�k�k�S; �•�'��'E�„�^': . .
<br /> resolved prior to the application proceeding`for�wtard to thegCo�ikeil M �°
<br /> ��'�X�a�o ��Y�F#`i����31�Sa�tF�'v#3tt1f..
<br /> Hessberg requested the Planning Commtsston provide some gut�anoe on:'the hardcover for the larger]ot.
<br /> � ���%� ���� �Y����";�'�,
<br /> Hessburg noted his purcl�ase agreenieiit�s coiitulget�t on the City';Cotuicil approving his proposal for tlie
<br /> r�� G� t�. � ,� ���
<br /> ��;�'S���'' ����.��en`r ,�s,�ts"::
<br /> two lots. Hessburg stated the p�oblern with the iwo story�s whetlier he can get 50 percent of the
<br /> � �,��'�����'���. ���-3�=�"
<br /> foundation below grade. -•�;��7f��� 4�M�
<br /> . �u3"c�Xr���4�"�` � Y
<br /> �' 'ir�'��� r. �����i�T�rf M`
<br /> Curtis stated she:has not conducted an�anal�sis to determine whether the revised plans would comply with
<br /> ��2 3�s�.�5i.� '���i�4.�� yt,Fp� ��'�tY,`��c ��y,,-
<br /> y z3�Y,t��1�yy'�$aF4. h,��i ���h'��i Y�`'4�itdi�9{p t�'�i�'a� �
<br /> �j�.�"Ys�.**` ���*.5;��`�"C+k'�''k'� �„ �w t�^v^C��k g`s���'
<br /> tlie Crty s�proposed zon�ng code atnendment on defnitions of basement and story.�
<br /> *� ,,,.���•,F "'�c4�����,��h '4��,+v::`
<br /> �4� a�'�}.y.` 35 �r��� �� �.�,i .
<br /> R� ��.�4St� �'.�'`!C�'�a� c_k1
<br /> lu�sta�ed lie would feel mo�;e comfortable appcoving the application if the City Engineer has made
<br /> �t1��'�,�, s��'h ���' c k��x
<br /> '4�(:e3n ��.�,,,}"' 'Y�,��.,,�
<br /> � some recommendations on these plaus;f
<br /> -�� ,U
<br /> � � rN �:
<br /> . i`�'`a5;w�'�i�. qyfiF� y��k�y`a.r*'�
<br /> �`b�f' e 6.fy k r�i t���i��t��l
<br /> Hessburg��n�u�red xy�tthe Planning`Co�iimission could provide him with a nuinber that the hardcover
<br /> - i��ff s �`�lYy�t�) �!3��(?�c.K:. .
<br /> ���°�f� ;,4��, *����,�"?�
<br /> should be i educed to ��;�T�b&,�e��r,��
<br /> `"����.�'��;k ar s_.
<br /> •�t��Jc��������e:�'F�s
<br /> .�,�
<br /> Sausevere stated ui l�is v�ew,�the Planning Cominission has given the applicant good guidance on how his
<br /> ,,�,,,
<br /> plans should be revised and that it is difficult for the Planning Commission to give someone a definite
<br /> number on the hardcover that would be allowed on a lot. �
<br /> Breiner suggested the applicant table his�pplication to continue to work with staEf on his proposal.
<br /> Bremer opened the public hearing at 7:05 �.m.
<br />
|