My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
11-20-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 2:46:52 PM
Creation date
6/13/2012 2:25:36 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
451
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
mrxrr�rT�cs or T�ac <br /> � ORONO PLANNING C011'IlYITSSYON <br /> ' Monclay,August 21,2006 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (#OG-3225 875 SV73W,LLC, Contuzued) <br /> Jolvlsi:on stated tl�e circle basically allows vellicles to i.uin around. . <br /> Gaffi•on questioned wliether tlle tluee lots that sllare one driveway should Ue revised. <br /> Jolmston stated they would look at that. JoYuiston iildicated they llave t�ied to minimize the number of . <br /> units that have garage doors tliai:face the street and that ap�roximately llalf of the garages are side- � <br /> . loading garages. <br /> Gaffron suggested the driveway for Lot 3Ue revised sliglitly. <br /> Johnston stated they would loolc at that. � <br /> Breiner commented the circle migllt work Uetter if it were located further away fiom tlle houses and that it � <br /> might create some congestion being located in close proxinuiy to the uiiits. <br /> Jol�nston stated they could relocate the circle fiuther away from the units. Johnston pointed out ihat to ihe , <br /> east o.f.the circle is a Ueini that is proposed to be consixucted eight feet higher thaii tlie circle so the circle � <br /> would not be visible from old�Iigliway 12. � <br /> � Jurgens inquired whether the circle could be utilized for�arlcing somehow. <br /> 7ohnston stated they need to maintain 20 feet clear for fire access but that there might Ue some areas <br /> where parking could Ue accomplislied. � <br /> Kempf expressed a concern regarding fihe close proximity,of tlie sewer lift station to soine of the units. <br /> Johnston stated the lift siation is ne�.t to the road and that if it is located fiu-ther away from the road, a <br /> driveway would need to be consh ucted. Joluiston stated he would loolc at that issue but that they are <br /> linzited in tivhere the lift station could be located. <br /> Jurgens stated there are carUon�lfiers and other alternatives tliat could be looked at to haildle odors if it <br /> Uecomes aii issue. Jurgens inquired wliether i:his would be a city lift station. � � . <br /> Jolulston stated the City Engineer has indicated it would be a private lift sfiation. Johnston stated tlie main <br /> issue is to desi�i a small enough lift station to handle the flow adequafiely. <br /> RaYuz stated t11e driveways for Lots 3,4, S and S could Ue reconfigured in a belter manner and that some <br /> Uuinp-outs sliould be incor��orated. <br /> Jolmston stated he does noi;have any major issues with the reconunendations of the City Engineer except <br /> for fihe eight-inch wafier niain. Johnslon indicated he would spealc wi1:h the City�zlgineer regarding thai: <br /> item. <br /> The Planning Commission took no fonnal action on tliis item. . <br /> ' PAGE 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.