My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-16-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
10-16-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 3:30:23 PM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:38:09 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1749
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE#06-3238 <br /> � October 17,2006 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> Hardship St�tement <br /> Applica.nt 17as conipleted the Hardsliip Documentation Form attached as Exliibit B, and <br /> should be aslced foi additional testimony reglyding fihe application. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> Lr co�rsirleriirg app/icatio�rs for t�ariaiice, 1/re Plan�ring Conrmissian shn/!consider tke effect of t/re proposed <br /> variairce «po�r ihe Itealtlt, s��ety «nd welfare of tlre conrnrrr►iity, ��isfi�rg cr�rd arlticiprrlerl traffrc condi�io�rs, <br /> !ig/tt a�ttl air, da�rger of frre, risk to ihe public srrfety, anrl!/1e effect on vr�h�es of property i�t t/re strrroturding <br /> «rea. Tlre Planiri�tg Co»rmissio�r slrall corrsider reconunendiirg approiu�l for l�arirurces from the litera! <br /> provisions of t/re Zoning Code irr iilstrutces w/rere their slrict enforceurenl would carrse undue /rards/rip <br /> becrrrtse of circ�rmsla�ices «niqrre to Ihe individrnr/property �rnrler co�rsideralion, «ir�l s/tall reconv�teitd <br /> approna!only wlre�r it is demo�estrated i/r�rt suc/r actiais ivill be in keepi�rg rvit/e t/�e spirii«ucl i�tte�rt of t/re <br /> Oraro Zo�ring Code. � <br /> Issues for Considerntion � <br /> While Staff fuids that conditions exist that would warra.iit approval of the variances, Staff <br /> tliinks the uiconsistencies between the two surveys aud between what was approved and what <br /> exists should be resolved before the Plaruung Conuliission nlakes a recommendation. By the <br /> time Staff fouiid these inconsistencies it was too late for tiie applicant to respond for tlus <br /> meetiiig. Staff expects hardcover to be reduced to tlie Ievel approved in Zoiung.File #2016 <br /> � and fiii�ther if possible. <br /> To avoid fiirther delay, it would the helpful to the applicant aiid Staff if the Commissioil <br /> would review the building elevations and give an iildication of theu acceptability. <br /> Are there any other issues or conceriis with tlus application? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Planning Staff recorruilends that after conmienting on the building elevations the <br /> Comniission table this item to allow clarification of hardcover calculations. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.