Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-32 15 <br /> ' July 17,2006 � <br /> - Page 4 of 4 <br /> required tluee foot square landing at the lower level door arid the steps to the lake. • <br /> The house was const�ucted before there was asi aver�ge lakeshore setback. The house to the <br /> south is unusually far from the lake because of the topography of th�t lot. It is also about 14 <br /> feet higher than the applicants' house aud separated by a band of trees. There ate also trees <br /> along the iiorth property line. � <br /> It does not appear to be possible to briug the property into compliance with the 75-250 <br /> hardcover regulations. The existing house/deck/porch (iilcluding portioiis iii the 0 to 75 <br /> zone), a ininimum a.iziouizt of driveway aiid a ininimuni sidewalk to the front c�oor would <br /> result in about 32 percent hardcover in tliis zone. . <br /> Witlun tlie 75 to 250 foot zoiie Staff tliinlcs additional llardcover removals are possible—the <br /> stone patlz around the side of the house a�.id niore of the driveway. <br /> Issues for Consideration � <br /> In reviewing the hardcover variance for the 75 to 250 foot zone the Comniission should <br /> consider if the additioiial living space is necessary and if proposed plan is the appropriate <br /> way of providing it. <br /> Are tllere any other issues or concerns with tlus application? <br /> Staff Recommendation � <br /> Plaruling Staff reconuiiends approval of the setback aiid hardcover variai�ces for the portion <br /> of the existing house/porcl�/deck within the 75 foot shoreline setback. If tlle Commission <br /> detei�nines the average lakeshore setback and liaidcover variances for the addition are <br /> appropriate Staff reconlmends they be subject to hardcover removals beyond those proposed. <br />