Laserfiche WebLink
7 <br /> J <br /> #OS-3102 920.Brown Rd.S. <br /> � July 6,2006 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Structural Covera�e: <br /> Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage <br /> 40,385 s.f. (0.93 ac.) Allowed: 6,058s.f. (15.0 %) <br /> Initial Proposal: 3,463 s.f. ( 8.6 %) <br /> Revisecl Pla�i: 3,714 s.f ( 9.2 %) <br /> Approved Plan: 3,429 s.f. ( 8.5 %) <br /> 2006 Proposal: 4,127 s.f. (10.2%) <br /> Hardcover C�lculations: <br /> Hardcover Total Area Allowed Existing 2006 Proposed <br /> Zone in Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0-75' 3,220 s.f. 0% (to be removed) 0 s.f. (0%) <br /> 75-250' 21,825 s.f. 5,456 s.f. (25 %) (to be removed) 3,162 s.f. (14.5 %) <br /> 250-500' 15,340 s.f. 4,602 s.f. (30%) (to be removed) 4,552 s.f. (29.7 %) <br /> Totals 40,385 s.f. 10,058 sf (to be reiiioved) 7,714 s.f. <br /> Summary of Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. The 2006 proposed site plan and build'uig plans have different locatious aud magnifi.ides <br /> of side setback encroaclunents as compared to the plans approved in 2005. Do these <br /> chaiiges cause auy potential negative impacis to the neighborhood? <br /> 2. Are the liardships that supported graiiting of the side setback variances in 2005 still valid <br /> for tlle revised site plan aild building plans? <br /> 3. Are the impacts of the added length of encroaclunent of both side yards appropriate in the <br /> context of this neighborllood and the locations of neighUoring honzes? <br /> 4. Are there a�iy otlZer issues with ihis proposed rebuild? <br /> Staff Recommendation <br /> Plamiing Commission is requested to make a recommendation to Council as io wliether the side <br /> setback encroaclunents proposed in 2006 meet with the inteilt of the 2005 approval. This item <br /> will be brouglit bacic io the Couilcil with Plaiuliiig Conunission's recommendations on July 24. <br />