Laserfiche WebLink
. FILE#06-3206 � <br /> • � July 17,2006 <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br /> Date Application Received: 5/16/06 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete: 6/5/06 :� <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 8/5/06 <br /> Extended Review Period Expires: 10/4/06 <br /> To: Chair Rahn and Plaruling Cominission Members <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> From: Evelyn Turner, City Planner <br /> Date: July 17, 2006 <br /> Subject: � #06—3206 Ken and LoriJean Anderson, 4224 Forest Lake Drive <br /> Hardcover,Lakeshoce Setback, Structural Lot Coverage and Side Lot Line <br /> Setback Variances - Public Hearing • <br /> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Zoning District: LR-1B � <br /> Lot Area: 15,565 s.f . �� <br /> Lo#Widtlh: 110 fe�t <br /> Applicatio�z Suinmrcry: The applicants are requesting variances to allow 26.6 % hardcover <br /> in the 0-75 foot zone where 39.9 % currently exists and no hardcover is noi�nally allowed, to <br /> allow 39% hardcover where 43% currently exists and 25% is normally allowed, to allow <br /> structural lot coverage of 27.1% where 28% now exists and 15% is normally allowed, to <br /> ' allow a structure 25 feet from Forest Lake when a 75 foot setback is required, and to alfow � <br /> the garage to have a 5.7 foot setback frorn the side property line when a ten foot setback is <br /> required. The purpose of fhese variances is to al(ow a second story to be added to the <br /> esisting structure and the garage enlarged to three stalls. As an alternative the applicants <br /> propose 32.7 percent hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone, 39 percent hardcover in the 75-250 <br /> zone and 28%lot coverage. <br /> Staff Reconimend�tion: Planning Department Staff recommends approval of proposal B <br /> with reduction in the size of the deck. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> A. Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits from June 17, 2006 <br /> B. Planning Commission Minutes of June 17, 2006 <br /> C. Letter from applicant with revised proposals A and B. <br /> D. Sketch of Staff Recommended Reductions in Hardcover. <br /> � ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Background <br /> This item was tabled to allow the applicants to make revisions to their proposal to reflect <br /> the Commission's comments. Commissioners ��ere satisfied with the second stor}� <br /> addition but were expectina a greater reduction in hardcover than the applicants had <br /> proposed. <br />