My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
07-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 11:26:04 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 11:25:10 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
679
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NIINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANIVING COMMISSION MEETING � <br /> • Monday,June 19,2006 ��� <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Anderson stated the deck was there at the time they purchased the property. <br /> Rahn inquired whether the applicants would like to revise their plans. <br /> Anderson indicated he would like his application tabled. <br /> i�AI►1�k�( <br /> Bremer stated if the�g walls are necessary for grading,the Planning Commission would need to be <br /> informed of that. <br /> Anderson stated removal of the rocks would cause additional water runoff into the lake and really <br /> F <br /> should be a nonissue. ��6 <br /> 50 <br /> Turner stated she took into account when she did the hardcover calculation that�the rocks are required <br /> for retainage. <br /> Rahn moved,Kempf seconded,to table Application#06-3Z06,Ken Anderson,4225 Forest Lake <br /> Drive,to allow the applicants time to revise their drawings. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> 7. #06-3207 RICK AND JULIE KRIEGER,355 STUBBS BAY ROAD,CONDITIONAL <br /> USE PIERNYY�',7:12—7:29 F.lYI. <br /> Sven Gustafson, Contractor,was present on behalf of the Applicants. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants are in the midst of constructing an addition to their barn and they are now <br /> requesting,based on the nature of that structure and the use of the siructure,to include installation of <br /> plumbing consisting of a toilet,lavatory and shower,plus a sink and laundry facilities,to be connected <br /> to a holding tank rather than the existing septic system serving the residence. <br /> Gaffron indicated he has not had an opportunity to review the report that was recently submitted by the <br /> applicants. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the standard covenants regulating <br /> use�of accessory structures�vith plumbing. The use of a holding tank rather than connection to a septic <br /> system should be discussed with the applicants in the context of the proposed use of the facilities. <br /> Rahn commented he is not familiar with a holding tank, <br /> PAGE 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.