Laserfiche WebLink
JUI. 7, 2006 11 :45AM DANBERRY COMPANY N0, 491 P, 3 <br /> , , <br /> 4. The additional living space on the second levef is in fihe center af the <br /> footprint of �Che existing house with at�ic areas on the o�het 3+ sides to <br /> minimize any setback issuES, <br /> 5, I realize a portion of my house sits in the 75' lake sefiback zone, as <br /> will a portion of my additional living space an the 2nd level. <br /> 6. I realize I am ov�t' on exisfiing structural hardcover and total <br /> hardcover, however, I am offering �he enclosed reductions (see example A) <br /> in both hardcvvers as a good will gesture to assist in �he approval of my <br /> new rooflfne, which, by ifiselfi, does no� impact any hardcover. As part of <br /> this hardcover reduction I am offering a reduction of my deck only if I can <br /> add a smalf corner onto the garage. This corner needs a side setback <br /> � variance for jusfi the corner- not the whole side. There is no living space � <br /> above this corner, This garage corner is aver exisfiing hardcover and <br /> actually res�lts in a net redu�t9oh i� hard��yAr by itself. The c�m�ain�tio� <br /> af redeaced deck and added garage corner results in a ne� reduction fn <br /> structural hardcover and tofial hardcover along wifih a reduction in <br /> structural hardcover in �h� 7'S' zone. <br /> 7. The lo� adjacent to the proposed side setback variance is owned by an <br /> associa�ian and has no structure on it, This also makes �he average <br /> lakeshore issUe mute. <br /> 8. My new roofline does not adversely affect anyones siteline or <br /> drainag�, <br /> 9, 1 will accept leaving my deck alone and not getting my garage corner <br /> along with other hardcover concessions in example B to gairt the roofline <br /> changes proposed in the 75' setback. Its your choice. <br />