Laserfiche WebLink
FILE#06-3206 , <br /> � June 19,2006 <br /> Page 4 of 4 <br /> hardcover would be substantially reduced. Depending on the distance to grade the <br /> uncoverecl portion of the deck m�.y no longer be consiclered struct�iral hardcover. It <br /> would also increase the setback of the deck froin the lake to about 40 feet. This is shown <br /> . on the attached sketch, along with other liardcover that could be eliminated. With these <br /> reductions hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone would be about 24 percent. Harcicover in the <br /> 75-250 foot zone would be reduced but not as substantially.� <br /> The angled corner of the garage was necessary to comply with the ten foot setback. <br /> Wlule it would be difficult to coiistruct a pitched roof over the angled wall, it caiz be <br /> squared off as shown oii the sketch that shows hardcover reductions. This would not <br /> require a setback variance. <br /> The property to the west is conunon area for the Forest Arins Homeowiiers' Associatioiz. <br /> It has no buildings on it. Views to the lake fiom the house to tlie east would not be <br /> impaired by the proposed second story. <br /> � Issues for Consideration � � <br /> Are�liere any other issues or concer�is with this application? <br /> Staff Recommendation ` . <br /> Tf the Conunission finds the conditions for recoinmending approval of sonie or all of the <br /> variances are satisfied approval should be conditioned on at least the following: <br /> 1. Reinoval of significant portions of tlie existing deck to result iii less hardcover and a <br /> greater setback from the lake. <br /> 2. Removal of as much excess hardcover as possible (see exhibit H). � <br /> 3. Extensioii of the garage to not encroach on the ten foot required side setback. <br />