Laserfiche WebLink
/ • FILE#06-3206 � <br /> June 19,2006 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> Setbacks• . � , <br /> Re uirect Existing Proposed <br /> Street 35 feet 35.5 feet 35.5 feet <br /> Lake 75 feefi 23.1 feet 25 feet <br /> Noc-th Side 10 feet 10.8 feet 5.7 feet <br /> Sol�th Side 10 feet 14.1 feet 14.1 feet <br /> Structural Covera�e: <br /> Ilowed Existin Pro osed <br /> 2,334.75s.f. (15%) ,370 s.f. (28%) ,219 s.f. (27.1%} <br /> Hardcover Calculations: , <br /> Hardcover Zone Total Area in Allowed Existing Pi•oposed <br /> Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover <br /> 0—75 8,228 s.f. . 0 s.f 3,287s.f.* 2.687 s.f. <br /> (0%) (39.9%) (32.6%) <br /> 75—250 7,337 s.f. 1,834.25s.f. 3,157s.f.* 3,134 s.f. <br /> � (25%) (43.0%) (42.0%) <br /> * After exclusion of fabric or plastic-luzed landscape beds <br /> ---------------------------------------=--------------------------=----------------- <br /> Hardship Statement <br /> Applica�lt has completed the Ha.rdship Docunlentation Form attached as Exlv.bit B, and <br /> should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> Hardship Analysis <br /> In consirleri�rg applicntia�s for varia�rce, flre Planiring Can»:issiori sktr!/ co�rsitler t/ie effect of tlle <br /> propose�l vnriance upon the hea111e,safet��nnrl welfare of ihe co»unrurit��, e�isting anrl anticipatet!irnffic <br /> • conrlitions, !ig/rt uirrl air, rlanger of frre, risk to 1/re prrblic srrfety, u�rrl!he effect oir va/cres of property in <br /> ihe surroruuliug area. T/re Plrurni�rg Con:»rissio�r shal/consitler reco��rmenrliirg approval for variances <br /> front 1/te literal provislo�rs of tke Zo�riirg Corle in ins/ances where their strict e�rforcement woulrl cacrse <br /> u�rdue Itards/rip beca[tse of circunista�eces trrlique to tlie indivirlun/property untler co�rsPderation, «�rd <br /> slrall reconrmend approval only when i[ is rlemo�rstrater!t/tat srrch aclions rui!!be in keeping witb t/re <br /> spirit rrird i�rteiet of t/re Oro�ro Zoni�tg Cotle. <br /> Staff finds that it would be ai1 undue hardship to not allow the flat roof to be replaced <br /> with a pitched roof. The Conunission should consider if the applicants have <br /> demonstrated that the second story, which requires niore volume be added to the portion <br /> of the stri.ichire within the 0-75 foot setback thai� would be necessary for just a pitched <br /> roof, is necess�uy to inake reasonable use of the property. The plans sllow that ilearly all <br /> the interior walls oil the first floor would be reinoved and replaced at different locations. <br /> The deck, even after the proposed reduction iii size, would still measure 18 feet by 36 <br /> feet. This does not include the 7 foot by 36 £oot porch adjacent to the deck. This is a <br /> large deck. The deck constructed when the house was built appears to 11�ve been smaller. <br /> By reducing the deck so the deck/porch nleasures 12 feet by 36 feet the an�ount of <br />