Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> #06-3196 <br /> May 9,2006 . <br /> • Page 3 <br /> Lot Area & Width Anal sis <br /> Individual �xistingTax Proposed Tax Proposed <br /> Parcel Areas Parcel Areas Parcel Area Lot Width <br /> Lot 1,Block 1,Blue Hill 79,300 s.f. 79,300 s.f. 210' <br /> � 1.82 ac. 90,200 s.f. 1.82 ac. <br /> Outlot A,Btue Hill 10,900 s.f. (2.071c.) <br /> 0.25 ac. 49,900 s.f. 208'/217' <br /> Lot 1,Block 2,Dragonfly Hill 39,000 s.f. 39,000 s.f. (1.14 ac.) <br /> 0.89 ac. 0.89 ac. <br /> ` Lot Buildability Analysis (post-rearrangement) <br /> Proposed 1391 Fox Street(RR-1B Zone): <br /> Required Principal Structl�re Setbacks: <br /> Front(North) - 50' <br /> Side(East) - 30' <br /> Rear(South) - 50' - <br /> Side Street(West) - 50' <br /> Buildable Area Witlun Setbacks: 135' +wide x 150' +deep 34,000 s.f. + <br /> Allowable Hardcover(500-1000' zone): 35%=27,000+s.f. <br /> Allowable Structural Lot Coverage: 15%= 11,900 s.f. ' <br /> Based on the above,the lot remauls very buildable absent the lakeshore strip. <br /> . Proposed 1401 Shoreline Drive (LR-lA Zone�: � <br /> Required Principal Structure Setbacks: . <br /> Lake (South) -75' � <br /> Side Street(West, along CR 15) - 50' <br /> Side (East) - 30' <br /> Rear(North, Orono Lane froiitage) - 50' <br /> Buildable Area Within Setbacks: 11,000 s.f. + <br /> Allowable Hardcover: 0-75' Zone(16,350 s.f. ±�: 0%= 0 s.f. <br /> � 75-250' Zone(31,250 s.f. +): 25%= 7,800 s.£ + <br /> 250-500' Zone (2,300 s.f. +): 30%= 690 s.f. + , <br /> Allowable Struct�iral Lot Coverage: 15%x 49,900 =7,485 s.f. <br /> The shape of the buildable area due to the location of County Road 15 is perhaps the <br /> inost liiniting factor in developing this site. Topography also will play a role ul <br /> deteriiiining house location. The driveway access musi; be to Orono Lane per Hennepin <br /> CoLUity, which adds length to fihe driveway and potentially liinits house size based on <br /> hardcover limits. The applicant lias provided a schematic drawing for a proposed house to <br /> ilhistrate the potential liiiiitatioiis for building on this site. Applicant suggests that a 20' <br /> east side setback for the attached garage in this scheine would fit the site better than if the <br /> sfiandard 30' setback is required. <br />