Laserfiche WebLink
, � <br /> / O`��r • . <br /> .•� ' V � . <br /> O O ' • <br /> �b. - CI'�Y of �RO1oTU - . <br /> � � . <br /> ti <br /> �� G�' � RESOLUTION ,OF THE CITY COUNCIL • <br /> ���`9k'.Eg� . N 0. � �' �' �. <br /> �� <br /> � approval by a vote of 6 to 0 based on the following fzndin�s and hardships: <br /> A. The proposed site plan has reduced hardcover in the 75-250' setback. <br /> B. The reduction of hardcover is due to a second driveway being removed and <br /> large portion of the existing parkin�area being reduced. <br /> C. The proposed garaje addition will replace an existin�detached garage on the <br /> property. A ne�v detached garage is proposed to be constructed at the reax of <br /> � the property approximately 210' from the house. <br /> D. The existin� house meets the required 75' lakeshore setback and average <br /> lakeshore setback. . • � <br /> � E. The current house was constructed prior to adoption of the current zonin� <br /> standards. The house�vas constructed 8' from the property line at the corner <br /> � ' where the property addition will meet the e,cisting house. The house is <br /> constructed on the lot closer to the property line on the north side, towards <br /> the lake. The addition thus moves further from the side property line as the <br /> addition moves further from the lake. The 2' variance allows the garage <br /> addition to continue the line of the existin�house tivhile maximizin�usable � <br /> yard space east of the addition. <br /> F. The property is one of only a few residential lots in the City of Orono that is <br /> located adj acent to a B-2 (Commercial — Marina) zoning district. The . <br /> • proposed house additions will help to screen the marina use ne:ct door and <br /> protect the small amount of yard area located on the east side of the house. ' � <br /> ' G. The lot is a "back lot". Another residential lot is located between North <br /> Shore Drive and the property. <br /> . 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it <br /> and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district;that granting the <br /> variances will not adversely affect traffic conditions,light, air,nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighborin;property;would not merely serve as a convenience to <br /> the applicant, but is necessary to aileviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is . <br /> necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping r,vith the spirit and intent of the Zonin�Code and Comprehensive Plan of the <br /> City. <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br />