Laserfiche WebLink
�. <br /> Jurgens stated if the gravel could be eliminated, he would view this as a win/win sit�iltion and that there ' <br /> would be justification for a(lowing ihe 38 percenl hardcover given the right-of-way. <br /> Raht� inquired what the width of the main body of the house is. <br /> , <br /> Lemmerman stated the peak height would be I 5. ' <br /> r+. <br /> �{E&�'S � <br /> f =�ftF1 � '��+ M <br /> R1hn recommended restricting the peak height not to exceed 16��feet a�� �,��;�: <br /> r y't ��,��.�.+ � ,,��f1 c�� <br /> �u�x s d� � <br /> ✓ZLa L� ��+�i���as1XX <br /> Leslie commented there lppears to be a lot of changesathat have bee�i,dts�ussed tonight and that perhaps it <br /> ,,t;�;'#r�� `4f-.�� �,r��t�a�a <br /> , � <br /> K '�g I �����.�t�i�; 3 g Sq.�_.���� � <br /> � ��"���?t� ty }��r' '�' �,a�`(x `N����v raa*` r., . <br /> would be wise to review a plan reflecting tonight s c�is�cussion���,�,��a,F�x � �.,��L�,���, � ..G��r,�t>„ <br /> +���'`�fa�3��-�,-,�� ���''��`1 �'•�'i�*;J�r£� j�4.��'x'fi�"``'"I�j <br /> fy"�j4�.r�te;c+wF�.'�'� ��i�d�y kt�r����'���� <br /> Bremer stated she would not be opposed to allowing the ap�y�phcafion to proceed to the cot��crl without the <br /> � ,.�A, � ,;�,P y, �.>y1 ,;��L1r:'�` <br /> J�rt���T�rF'iy�`�r Pi1to2� <br /> ri t��y�� y�a�.��s`�r,��i w, <br /> Planning Comtnissioit seeing a revised plan. ��;�,r ?;���„ Yk��4 <br /> ,� }St�.hf`�Y 15�� <br /> Jur ens stated there is merit fa•brin in this a l�eation back before the`P�anniii'g Commission and that <br /> g g� g PP,s,. � r ti � 4, -nrS�J�? :�� <br /> � ,y�}lr�..�j������}Sj���;e:. f�i iw�;cj:� <br /> � ��x a rrt��r�ti`YrfFbr.s ';.o��.... <br /> he would like to see this a lication tabled. °`� _� s�� � r s�;�sLJ s,; - <br /> PP r,�#s r��';�• �+, ,.� , <br /> s4�t-,h � 4 #���+cf� `SS� �. <br /> �J�#tt'�� ,tt.�.���'t�t��r.�o-ty`s'` t}s"�F rt.. <br /> Brady stated they would like to take the recommendations'of the�Rl�nntng Commission and incorporate <br /> zr'1 i.1ci� i'4�Gel- '�r•';�' Y e���: <br /> S'!,.s � 9 r � �� <br /> � ���'��T 11T �sj f f 4�"x L <br /> them into their plan and bring it to the..City Council��:��'ti';�A ���� <br /> „�i 2ti�� t`'�'"a �r �,,<`'K�3p <br /> .. .. ��y��L�};Y;,p. �:��s���#. ,�t 4 �r... . <br /> €'�fi1- �ify�'• �.�, x+,i +� 7 ��Ya�r <br /> Kempf stated it might not be ne�cessary�to bring the plan}baclC�efore the Planning Commission since the <br /> � '�°� t� ^'>f.«s�'i:.���` <br /> _-��� f � <br /> hardcover is not going to be re°yd�uced fo�35 percent. <br /> k�` �����YY�� p� � <br /> iy�Rrt L;�; tY''� «'S�ti il�n. . <br /> Rahn stated �n{his��ieyy^the Plannin�Commission should review the revised plan. <br /> tC�f�� r��t�la�jt�'?�'� x-},�zL 1 ..,.����;ry�ts��F j..�,�`Y�.. <br /> �`.3�`+,��`���ro�"C?a�sy 4a,7�7�'.`�eF�����t�, ;L�����r�a��'Yv�i� � . <br /> Leslie�moved;}Rahn'seconded�to table A�n'�n`I�cation#06-3172 Lemmerman Construction for <br /> e�k N'i���,��n, .i�1T �tx.�f�*��way4 1'C,�,�����r. � <br /> �*Fi�4�.�ts�I�'� ° � 1{�C�; w'l:, - '('r�°' <br /> �-��'�'� � �r;'� "` � ��,�<�-�z t2 <br /> T�mothyrRussell and Lynn AnnaBracly,3555 Frederick Street,fo allow the applicants time to <br /> rF�` 'H i ryy��,.y,.S� q� ����t{�CmF� <br /> ,�,iM�,(S�t��'1 F'°'�x�i.p, ��3}��� . <br /> submif re�ised plans. VOTE: A�es:4,Nays 2,Berg and Bremer Opposed. <br /> ��R���j��� ����y-��� <br /> ae za�'.7� ��'l 7._ i t�„t �� . <br /> Rahn stated k�ei�yould be rece�ty�erto,a couple of four-foot dorme�s for lighL � <br /> r�z�������� ��,�� ���F�k�?f�:. <br /> 3 'WA 1I '`�'� ��SY F� <br /> Brady inquired whe�iier�the applicants would need to meet the 35 percent hardcover. <br /> r-.�,�,�,,����r��`f,�;�,��;�� <br /> 4; i,�=';;L�`���ifE:• <br /> Berg recommended th�.!apa'j%lic�nts be as close to the 35 percent hardcover as possible. <br /> .. <br /> .,..,�;. <br /> �rtk <br />