|
- Rahn stated redueing ihe size of the gar�ge will jusfi malce the ciriveway longer 1nd that eh�nging the
<br /> location of the driveway allows the applicant to h�ve 480 square feet of additional living space
<br /> downstairs.
<br /> Lemmerman stated thlt arel is less than seven foot high,which is 1(most no�ilivable storage.
<br /> r�: ,,
<br /> Brady stated the garage has been reduced so that the only room �s{for�ve,�i cles;with storlge being under
<br /> . . ��' ' F�`��L�xt���KY �j v��t
<br /> Jl ;y:. �y��-°�-.1� �a
<br /> the tuck-under portion. -��,�r a;t �����,¢;�,,����`f��
<br /> , . `�i�';Yiiki� t rf+�'tr�r,.;M1��N��o y'yulj s} �
<br /> Leslie pointed out that the applicants are not pro�osingto;tncrease harcico�vec on,fihls lot. ,�''�i�.
<br /> „t z� sr f� 4 ,.��'� 'S 2 R .�1 rf r}t��r{ pl ls.���
<br /> 't i' a � _/C�
<br /> �j�-'s`r�$'-�s E '�`;aZ±' t s} Lks,���'»��rpi i,"..
<br /> Rahn noted the proposed garage is minimal and that therezare`not atlot of places on this,,lo,t�wtiere the
<br /> � � �If� 3• �'�dJ=..
<br /> ' .1�k„�t u,ll1�i�ya�� ws,r'L:..
<br /> }y'�T[ : f}k�t�'nr}��4i SS
<br /> hardcover can be reduced. � �: �{i��°�f����xE�{�
<br /> y�"r �F�ri� 'wa�.V<y1,_'
<br /> z -F
<br /> C �
<br /> Lemmerman stated the tuck-under garage would be��use`d�for sto►•age '��;,;�7r;����;;
<br /> ,���,r k �,
<br /> t�yy��x'�t�r kt����?�y� Y ��ut'a�� A��
<br /> Bremer stated she would like the hardcover on�the Iot'redubeds�to aro�uld 35 percent.
<br /> � t a��t 4'.� �'��ir�' r'�"�"�;"r'�
<br /> �dT�:�s P�; 1�, T�n��,'�t4`r.�; �dtt+t.
<br /> ��of� ��iNS yP�°5Z `�'� � ��'�..1 �
<br /> Curtis stated removal of the retaining wall wo�tld,reduce�t�ie hardcover to.�a36.6 percent but does not
<br /> i4"�v a�5�. YT�`�Z rr`�rs�`
<br /> f� ��%�� ������ �5���{��YI��
<br /> include the reduction in the size of the�'garage. ���'�, ,�;F�'�
<br /> 1� hG—r-J y} eufw�.,�'t RFC ��i
<br /> . ��m��,}���. �Lj� K��i}���� j .
<br /> q,�l'NF i'°;^! Jiaf1
<br /> th�j�4�S'�ifir ^+/.f'}����t � �
<br /> Gaffron stated 80 square feet is ec�ua��to one percen���,The��deck�`consists of 300 sc�uare feet or four
<br /> �'��'�'>-s� �;;�ti'����'�F����"
<br /> �E�t` r,+iws'�'7 . h�:.i+�-
<br /> -s.��k H�P%'�5
<br /> percent. Gaffron stated the onlys,place�tie,sees where hardcover can be reduced is the deck.
<br /> 'Y;'Y. 4V3.(`4'���.-*� �v
<br /> �t�,'}�if � �S
<br /> ���
<br /> Brady stated he alsa�do`es not see an}�place to'.reduce hardcover other than the deck.
<br /> N''",^�'�lEt<��sk'�1�'h`''����Ef€*�T? ': e�-�`�ri�}af�t
<br /> �+�.��vr,��"� ?�•lr,`<�.z��"'�;+-`.��r�.����"; iky?���?I+���1
<br /> H i dv..
<br /> Rahn��nauired whetlier,tliestoop�`and walkway,�vould be reduced given the change in the grade.
<br /> •t�,�4'�ta�,£fr +'y�d�",�f�f.`?�ty�-'£ n f �
<br /> t �t x KY,`+'
<br /> ,�3�;�,,'��z�r ����`.�''�,1F`^�'� .
<br /> Lemmei�man stated that is going}to be,removed.
<br /> f�-F�'!��'�i '�r�c���TK�
<br /> rf��`t f �P"`°u`1 0-S � �����$tr3:..
<br /> Curt►�stiated that has already been included in the hardcover calculltions.
<br /> t� �F���t1 rk � � ;
<br /> •' �-1 4��.a��jS S SS T .i��'S�U'�'�'t
<br /> Kempf stateFd`under the circumstances, if the gravel in front of lhe house is returned to gr�ss, it would
<br /> ��'1`l�.�,�{�,(t M�SC t'F�`�tt L �"'�'""k�`�i:
<br /> 1� ��t� 11>}�., ,!^�a��'iyl,.�'
<br /> create a better s�hiation for,tyhe neighbors. Kempf st�ited this is a unique situation and that he would be
<br /> 4���'�'{t.'�€p�{I,k��'��'t�ts���� � .
<br /> °y.+4�i1 ..w.�t.�l;.�
<br /> willing to let fihe applic'ari;�tretam the existing hardcover sim��ly because of the unique situation with the
<br /> city's right-of way.
<br /> Berg noted fihe applicants are willing to reduce the encroachment down to three feet.
<br /> Leslie stated in his opinion the 35 percent hardcover is not unattainlble.
<br />
|