Laserfiche WebLink
#U5-3135 3165 Nortl� Sliore Di•ive � <br /> January 12,2006 <br /> Page 6 <br /> Tlie aFfected adjacent property ovv�ier, Morrie Wagener, vi1 Peter Joluison's leii:er, is objeciing to <br /> viy new encroaclulient of tlie �.verage setback. The proposed resideiice does create new verticll � <br /> encroaclm�ents; in the area of tlie 22' eiicrolclul�ent past the aver�ige setback liile, the existiiig <br /> house is oiily one level, perh�ps izo more ihan 12-15' above grouiicl, where 1:he proposed house <br /> will be 30' in heiglit. Platuiuig Colrunission slzould carefully review Jolnison's conuneuts iii <br /> deferiiuning wliether an aver�ge setb�ck variauce is appropriate. Also see the site photos taken <br /> froui tlie lake last summer. <br /> Additionally, Plai�iuiig Coiiunissioii should note that the proposed flat-roof liome has two <br /> clumneys extending as inuch as 10' aUove the roofluie. There is iio building or fire code <br /> requirement that they eafeiid this liigh. Their height is prinzarily for ornainental 1nd aesthetic <br /> purposes. Yot�r recoinmeizdation as to whether they are obtrusive eziough to warrant a CUP <br /> review under Section 78-1366 is requested. 78-1366 states: <br /> "Sec. 78-1366.Height of strnctures. <br /> (a) Tl�e heiglit limitations iinposed by other provisions of tlus chapter may be <br /> increased by conditional use permit by 50 percent when appliecl to tlie followuig structures: <br /> (1) Chtuch spires. <br /> (2) Belfries. <br /> (3) Cupolas aiid clonles wluch do not contain useable space. <br /> (4) Monuments. <br /> (S) Water towers. � <br /> (6) Fire and liose towers. <br /> (7) Observation towers. <br /> (8) Flagpoles. <br /> (9) Chimueys. <br /> (10) Smokestacks. _ <br /> (11) Parapet walls extending not inore than three feet above heiglrt of tlie building. <br /> (12) Cooling towers. <br /> (13) Elevator penthouses. <br /> � (b) Heiglits in excess of those allowed under subsection(a) of this section for the uses <br /> entmlerated in that subsection niay be pernuited ouly by coiiditioiial use permit granied ptusuant <br /> to the procedures as set forth ui article V, division 2, of tlus cliapter." <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1. Does the�roposed plau i'or filliil� create any negative impacts? Is ihere a Uasis�to reduce <br /> the aniount of filliiig bec�.use i:lus is on a private driveway system? Is there a basis to <br /> requ�re tliat the house be moved back, either to reduce fill ini�acts or elinzinate avera�e <br /> sel:back concerizs? <br /> 2. Is i:here suf�icieiit llardshi� or nuiigaiioii available to justify graniiilg the average setUack <br /> variaiice given the objeciion by tlie i�eighbor? � � <br /> 3. Are there aiiy other issues or coneeiiis wiih this applicatioii? � <br />