02-21-2006 Planning Commission Packet

Home Browse Search

#OS-3135 3165 North Shore Drive _ Jnnuary 12,2006 - P�ge 2 Sec. 78-1286. Topograplv.c alterations/grldiug ancl filliiig. (d) (2) For movement of niore than 500 cubic yards of nlaterial within the shoreland overiay district, couditional use peitiut approval by the city council is requued in lcldition to tl�e rec�uired la�id alteratioll periilit. , x,ist of Exhibits - . A-Proposed Site Plan -Alternate A-Revised 1-10-OS B-Proposed Bui.lding Plans and�levations C-Application for Variance/CUP . D-Hardship Statement E-Hardcover Calculations by surveyor; Lot coverage calcs by staff F-City Evgineer Comments 1-6-06 G-Plat Map/Property Owners List ' H-Photos I-Original Plan Subinitta]with Correspondence, Staff&Engineer Conunents J-Peter 7oluison Coininents 1-11-06 � � Background � � Applicant submitted ai�.application in June 2005 for an average lakeshore setback variance and CUP for fill exceeding 500 c.y, in order to construct a replacenlent residence on tlus conforrning 1.4 acre lot. The original proposal (See Exlubit� included a 3-level residence with steeply pitched roofs, and fill of appro�:imately 1350 c.y.,plus an tulderground garage that they wished to have considered as non-hardcover. Staff concluded that tlie garage would be coiisidered as liardcover, and that plan would require a liardcover variaiice wluch was lugl�ly unlikely. The � adjoiniug property owner to the south,Maurice Wagener, also expressed concerns about lus poteiitial loss of lake views due to the high peaks. Applicant has siizce extended the review period to May 2006 and has recently subnutted a revised building plau aiid site plan(Exlubits A&B),for a flat roof, 2-level lio�ne 30' in maxinninl hei�ht as nleasured from the existin�grade,btrt requuuig 2350 cl�bic yards of fill at the rear to allow direct enhy to the upper level. Two access �tlteriiatives were iilitially proposed, each with slightly different hardcover inipacts, but neither requiring a hardcover variance. Alternate A contiiiues tlze existiiig access to Nor��. Shore drive for both i:he drivew�.y circle loop as we11 as for the uudergrounci garage access. Alternate B had North Shore Drive access for the garage,but Bolui's Point Road access i'or the circle drive. Stafl'was ldvised by Peter Joluison, afitoriiey for Wagener, that the driveway easement th�.t would be used for Alteriiate B has been abando�ied aatici is no longer valid, aiZd tllai: his client wi11 object to Alteriiate B. Tlic ap�licant h�s acluiowledged that access vi1 Altern�te A is ihe preferred plai�. . Note that the hardcover calculatioiis iiicll�de tlie portions of the gatage i:ha1: will be buried, as staff advised the applicant tllat ihis will still Ue considered as liardcover.