My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
02-21-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 9:55:39 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 9:55:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF TIIE <br /> ORONO PLANNING CONIIVJISSION MEETING <br /> Tuesday,January 17,2006 � <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> Bremer inquued whether Jurgens would agree to an encroachment within the average lakeshore setbacic if <br /> the height of the house were reduced. <br /> Jurgens stated he does not have an opinion on that at the present tiine until he has a plan in front of him <br /> depicting that. <br /> Leslie stated from his perspective this is a classic example of why the average lalceshore setUack exists <br /> and that the adjoining property is actually overlooking soine o£this property to the lake. Leslie indicated <br /> he does not see a hardship for the ericroaclunent,noting that tllis is a large lot and a large house. Leslie <br /> stated the code was not designed to ensure optiinum views for everyone and that the house could be <br /> reduced if the applicants want to retain the optimum view. <br /> Leslie stated he is uusure on the amount of fill,and that until an agreement is reached with the neighbors, <br /> he is not in support of the a�plication. <br /> Bremer reopened the public hearing. . <br /> Joluison repeated that the Wageners invite the Planning Commission to take a view froin their property to <br /> see llow this proposed residence would inzpacfi their view to the lake. Johnson stated they are going to <br /> research�vhether this is a restoration of the original grade,but that the Munson property gives the <br /> iinpression that it�vas dug out due to the fill hauled in on the Wagener property. <br /> Wagener stated there is a central breezeway to the house that�vould allow access to the back stoop and <br /> that vierv should give the Planning Commissioners an idea of the iinpact that the proposec�house would • <br /> have on their vie�v. ' <br /> Nelson stated the cunent•house has eight-foot ceilings with a vaulted peak roof. Nelson slaled tiley are � <br /> not going up fiom the peaked,roof and are really only proposing nine feet higher from the peaked roof. <br /> Nelson stated if the liouse were relocated back,tlle neighbor's vie�v would be impacted further. <br /> Bremer closed the public hearing. <br /> � PAG� 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.