My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-21-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
02-21-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2012 9:55:39 AM
Creation date
6/13/2012 9:55:14 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
439
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� <br /> MTNUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PZ,ANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> _ Tuesdny,January 17,200G <br /> 6:00 o'clocic p.m. <br /> 1. Does the proposed plan for�lling create any negative impacts? Is there a basis to reduce the � <br /> amount of filling because this is on a�rivate driveway system? Is there a basis to require that the <br /> house be moved Uack,either to reduce fill impacts or eliminate average setback concerns? <br /> 2. Is there suf�cient hardshi�or mitigation availaUle to justify graniing tl�e average setback variance <br /> given the objection by the neighbor? <br /> 3 Any other issues or concerns with this application that the Planning Commission would like to <br /> see addressed. <br /> Gaffion noted the hardcover calculations include the buried portions of the garage and that the applicants ' <br /> � do meet the lot area,lot width, and setbacks requirements. <br /> Gaffron stated two access alternatives were initially proposed,each wiYh slightly different hardcover � <br /> impacts,b�it neither requiring a hardcover variance. Alternate A continues the e:cisting access to North <br /> Shore drive for both ihe drive�vay circle loop as we]1 as for the underground garage access. Alternate B <br /> had North Shore Drive access for the garage,but Bohn's Point road access for the circle drive. Staff has <br /> been advised that the driveway easement that would be used for Alternate B has been abandoned and is � <br /> no longer valid and that the Wageners would oUject to Alternate B. � <br /> It is the recommendation of Staff that the application be tabled at this time. The appl�icant should be <br /> provided direction with regards to tlle fill,with regard to whether an average setback vai•iance is likely,� <br /> and wheiher ihe chimneys should be subject to a conditional tise permit. . . � <br /> Allen Munson stafied on the south side of the lot there are h•ees that go all the way dotivn to the�vater and . <br /> the Wagener residence is set 331 feet back from the lalce. Munson indicated the property on the other sicie ' � - � � . <br /> is 76 feet back from the water, which cuts tluoti�h the existing part of the house. Munson stated they <br /> tried several different options to relocate the house b�►t were unsuccessfi�l due to the topograplly of the lot. <br /> Munson pointed out on his model where the 1louse�vould be located and the tree lines. Munson � <br /> stated the slope of the land runs into the house, which requires the creation of a s�vale around the house. <br /> PAG� 19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.