Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION ME�TING <br /> Tuesday,January 17, 2006 _ <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> impacts than tlie relatively low-profile, one and two-Ievel existing home. Gaffron stated the a�plicants <br /> are proposing an encroachment of approximately 22 feet. <br /> Gaffron stated the applicants have proposed to incor�orate approxiinately 2350 cubic yards of�11 on the <br /> west side of the proposed home to control drainage while creating a walkout situation allowing the <br /> primary enh ailce at the upper level of the two-story home. The existing relatively flat r.ear yard�vill be . <br /> raised as much as ten feet. Sonze fraction of this fill will act to restore grades that existed at the Uase of <br /> the slope prior to construction o£the existing house in the 1960s. The city engineer and staff have�vorked <br /> with the applicant's architect to identify and resolve issues with site drainage. The City Engineer has <br /> reconmlended the following issues Ue addressed: . <br /> 1. Grading on the neighboring property to the northeast is proposed to convey drainage across that � �. �, . . <br /> property. The Applicant might consider a lot line reanangeinent,but as a minimum will require , . . . <br /> drainage easements frorn that neighbor. Tlze applicant has been requested to provide�vritten . <br /> evidence that this neighbor will coo�erate in this regarding plan. <br /> 2. Engineering design needed for 10 feet high retaining walIs at garage entrance. � <br /> 3. The 2350 cubic yards of�11 could be substantially reduced if the house is moved north and�vest <br /> and angled slightly. 2350 cubic yards hanslates to 235 truckloads entering the site. The applicant . <br /> has indicated the primary reason he proposes to build in the same location as the existing house is � . <br /> related to views of the lalce. : � . • � ". <br /> �. Tlie existing foundation needs to be rernoved,as applicant hopes to re-use portions of it, and soils, . •�� <br /> analysis is also recoinmended. � � .� � '• � � <br /> 5. The applicant is rec�uired to provide 2-10-100 year drainage calculations. <br /> Gaffron noled drainage calculations have been provided to Staff at tonight's meeting. . � , <br /> G��Lfron stated the following issues should be discussed: � � <br /> PAGE;18 <br />