Laserfiche WebLink
c <br />• <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(6. #09 -3428 MICHAEL AND MARILYNHUTHWAITE, 3382 BAYSIDE ROAD, Continued) <br />The applicants have reduced the overall size of the home footprint by only 167 square feet. However, <br />they have reduced the proposed patios, reoriented the driveway and vehicle courtyard and have proposed <br />a significant reduction in the portions of the home and hardcover to be located within the 75 feet creek <br />setback. Their initial proposal was for 2,322 square feet of hardcover within the 0 -75 foot zone. <br />Their revision reflects a 965 square foot reduction within this zone. The revisions result in 365 additional <br />proposed square feet within the 75 -250 foot zone. <br />The revision also proposes to meet the 50 -foot setback on the western Bayside portion of the property and <br />will only be two feet short of the 50 -foot setback on the Crestview side of the lot. Moving the home <br />farther from the creek results in a 60 -foot setback where 75 feet is required, which is an improvement of <br />ten feet from the previous plan. This shifting of the home to the north allows for only an 11 -foot setback <br />from the side lot line and adjacent neighbor's property where a 30 -foot setback is required. A 16 -foot <br />setback was initially proposed. <br />The property is currently four separate tax parcels which are proposed to be combined in conjunction with <br />a building permit. <br />The Planning Commission also indicated that the inclusion of hardcover mitigation measures such as <br />• native vegetation buffers, rain gardens, pavers, etc., was encouraged. The applicants continue to propose <br />to incorporate wetland buffers in the required areas as well as additional areas in order to attempt to <br />mitigate for the excesses in hardcover. The Planning Commission voted 5 -0 to recommend approval of <br />the revised plans. <br />Staff still believes the design of the house does not fit the constraints of the property. The shape of the <br />house seems to be a desire of the applicants to re- recreate their existing residence rather than design a <br />home better suited to the property. Staff also continues to recommend denial of the footbridge over the <br />creek. There are existing alternatives for access to the southern portion of the property via Crestview or <br />Bayside Road. <br />Jerry Steiner, Attorney -at -Law, noted he represents the Applicants, who currently reside in Tennessee, <br />and are unable to make tonight's meeting. Steiner stated in his view there is no dispute that the hardship <br />criteria have been met and that there is no issue that variances are warranted for the property. This is a <br />difficult piece of property to work with given the topography and size of the lot. <br />The project proposed by the Huthwaites will be a significant improvement to the neighborhood. Stubbs <br />Bay Creek crossing this property is in a very deteriorated condition and this project will help correct the <br />erosion problems by doing bank stabilization and native plantings. There will also be substantial <br />improvement to the water quality of the creek compared to what currently exists as a result of the <br />reclamation efforts of this project. The project also eliminates a significant amount of hardcover in the <br />0 -75 foot zone. <br />Steiner noted the neighborhood between Crestview on the east and Bayview on the west are comprised <br />• almost entirely of lots that are under half an acre. The zoning district requires a two -acre lot size but there <br />are virtually no two acre lots in this area. If this lot were located in a one -acre district, the variances to the <br />side setbacks would not be required. <br />PAGE 3 of 8 <br />