Laserfiche WebLink
;.- <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 23, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />(4. ON SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE — BARRY TANNER AT 3435 SHORELINE DRIVE, <br />Continued) <br />Bremer moved, Franchot seconded, to approve the On Sale 3.2 Percent Malt Liquor License for <br />Barry Tanner at Navarre Lanes located at 3435 Shoreline Drive effective January 1, 2010, through <br />December 31, 2010. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION COMMENTS — KIM KANG, REPRESENTATIVE <br />Kang stated she had nothing to report but would be available for questions. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />None <br />ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT <br />*5. #08 -3382 BERKSBIRE PARTNRS, LLC, 2745 KELLEY PARKWAY ( ORONO <br />PROFESSIONAL BUILDING 11) — FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL EXTENSION — • <br />RESOLUTION NO. 5886 <br />Bremer moved, Murphy seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5886, a Resolution Extending the <br />Approvals for Planned Unit Development No. 3B Orono Professional Center H and Amending <br />Resolution No. 5783. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />6. #09 -3428 MICHAEL AND MARILYN HUTHWAITE, 3382 BAYSIDE ROAD — <br />VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 5887 <br />Jeremy Steiner, Attorney -at -Law, and Rick Hendel, Builder, were present. <br />Curtis noted the applicant originally was requesting a conditional use permit for grading within 75 feet of <br />Stubbs Bay Creek as well as lot area, creek setback, and hardcover within the 0 -75 foot and 75 -250 <br />setback zone variances in order to construct a replacement residence. At that time the Planning <br />Commission directed the applicant to address the following: <br />1. The footprint of the home should be reduced in order to better fit within the required street, side, <br />and creek setback. The creek setback was identified as a priority. <br />2. The attached garage could be reduced in order to alleviate a portion of the encroachment into the <br />creek setback. <br />In addition, the Planning Commission seemed to feel the CUP for stream bank stabilization and the <br />variances for the proposed crossing or footbridge over the creek were acceptable. • <br />PAGE 2 of 8 <br />