Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCEL MEETING <br />Monday, January 26, 2004 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />MAYORICITY COUNCIL REPORT, Continued <br />Murphy suggested the City monitor the public's reaction to the increase, noting that the increase <br />might deter people from asking for variances, to a certain degree. <br />McMillan queried the potential of offering a separate breakout based on the number of variances <br />requested for an application. <br />Gaffron stated that, administratively, some applications begin with 1 -2 variances, which under <br />further examination turns into 4 -5 variance requests. <br />McMillan asked if other neighborhoods were affected this same way in the Orono area. <br />Gaffron stated that many neighborhoods were zoned differently than what is in place in an effort to <br />protect the lake in the 1970's. <br />McMillan pointed out that rezoning these pockets might, in fact, reduce the workload for the <br />Planning Commission and staff. Since the reality is that, many areas are zoned differently than <br />actually exists, she questioned the amount of time and resources spent trying to obtain a balance. <br />Acting Mayor White suggested this discussion be continued during an upcoming work session <br />agenda. While he had many concerns to add to the discussion, White pointed out that, often, the <br />smaller neighborhoods are where the lower to moderate income residents reside in Orono and <br />• questioned how the fee schedule might impact their ability to improve their housing situation. <br />Murphy set forth an altogether different perspective, the option of not considering variances at all. <br />He believed, though cumbersome, the process was effective. <br />n <br />U <br />Sansevere questioned how the City's fee structure compared to other communities. <br />Gaffron stated that, while the new fee structure put Orono on the high side, Orono entertains more <br />variance requests due to the restrictive zoning and number of nonconforming properties. <br />Council member Murphy gave a progress report on the Highway 12 project, stating that MnDOT is <br />in negotiations with Ames Construction to renegotiate the contract for construction, in an effort to <br />recalibrate the accompanying timeline and road closures. Murphy recommended staff and Council <br />do its best to remind citizens that over the next 3 -4 years all the major thorough fares will be closed <br />at alternating times. He stated that Old Crystal Bay Road was expected to be the first to close in <br />mid spring for the next few years, during which extensive rerouting of the public and school system <br />will be necessary. Murphy indicated that weekly meetings and updates are ongoing with MnDOT. <br />He mentioned that the City of Long Lake would be asking Orono to join them in a series of <br />discussions about the turn back of Highway 12. <br />PAGE 5 of 10 <br />