My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2006
>
01-17-2006 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2012 2:16:33 PM
Creation date
5/17/2012 11:33:25 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• Off-Street Parking section: <br /> o Off-Street Parking General Conditions: Item A on page 21 <br /> • ... excavating equipment many not be parked," should be changed to <br /> ".., excavating equipment may not be parked," <br /> o Off-Street Parking Restrictions for i-Industrial District: Item F on page 23 <br /> ■ Parking Setbacks: Consider listing conditional use allowing zero foot <br /> parking setback for lots which utilize shared drive aisles,joint parking <br /> facilifies or truck courts <br /> ■ A 10' set back from any building is unusual. The ability to park up to the <br /> building particular in the truck court is typical in an office-warehouse <br /> setting. <br /> o Off-Street Parking Location: Item A on page 24 <br /> ■ Provide a provision to allow for cross parking agreements between <br /> Owner's or principle/easers <br /> o Number of Off-Parking Spaces: Page 25 <br /> • Warehouse parking formula seems high. A more typical formula wou/d <br /> be about 1/2000 square feet <br /> ■ Office buildings/professional offices are typically 1 space for 200 square <br /> feef. <br /> o Deferment of Required Parking: Item d on page 27 <br /> ■ Can "proof-of-parking"ocair within truck court areas? <br /> o Deferment of Required Parking: Item e on page 27-28 <br /> ■ lt is unusual to require a restrictive covenant be record against the title <br /> as it relates to the additional parking. <br /> • Loading Facilities section: <br /> o Item A on page 28-29: <br /> ■ Clarification this is a minimum. <br /> ■ Clarification of berth, dock and loading facility definifions. <br /> o Ifem C on page 29: <br /> ■ Clarification on loading docks facing the new Highway 12 and the need <br /> to enclose <br /> o Item D on page 30 <br /> ■ Berth required sizes are confusing. Indoor or outside? <br /> ■ Clarificafion on definition of berth and dock <br /> ■ Discussion of screen options and heights for fruck cour�areas <br /> • Landscaping and Screening section: <br /> o Item a. on page 32 <br /> ■ Referring to the planting strip as `shall be designed to provide "complete" <br /> visual screening'. Define "complete"and whether this visual screening <br /> can occur wl�en trees mature. <br /> o Item c. on page 33 <br /> ■ Landscape Bonus -a better de�nition of what the amount of flexi6ility of <br /> burlding material reduction if overall landscape is over the allotment by a <br /> minimum of 50% <br /> • Signage section <br /> o Signage on page 38: <br /> ■ Allowable sign sizes seem smaller than normally found in other Industrial <br /> zone requirements. <br /> ■ No allowance for monument sign <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.