My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#4846-variances-2002
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
E
>
Eastlake Street
>
3415 Eastlake Street - 05-117-23-13-0052
>
Resolutions
>
#4846-variances-2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:17:19 PM
Creation date
7/13/2016 12:47:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3415
Street Name
Eastlake
Street Type
Street
Address
3415 Eastlake St
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0511723130052
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� o� <br /> o �_, o <br /> ��_:- CIT�' of ORONO <br /> � �� � <br /> ti <br /> �� Y` ��� �,, G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> L�kES�I�4� NO. � � � � <br /> required lot area. The property consists of approximately .23 acres or 10,200 s.f. <br /> (9,987 s.f. absent the area below the 929.4'). <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this application on July 15, 2002 at <br /> which time the Planning Commission tabled it for revisions. The applicants revised <br /> the application which revisions were reviewed by the Planning Commission on July <br /> 17,2002,at which time Planning Commission recommended approval of the revised <br /> proposal on a vote of 7 to 0. <br /> 4. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact: <br /> A. The property has been developed with a residential use since at least 1958. <br /> B. Approximately 75%of the property lies within the 0-75' setback zone,and a <br /> residence cannot be constructed on the property without encroaching <br /> substantially into the 0-75' zone. <br /> C. There is no additional land to combine with the property. The properties <br /> surrounding this lot are also undersized, are residentially developed, and do � <br /> not meet the required area in the zoning district. <br /> D. The residence meets City ordinance standards for sh-uctural lot coverage. The <br /> residence has been located to provide an acceptable street setback while <br /> minimizing driveway hardcover. <br /> E. The property can not be redeveloped unless variances are granted. <br /> F. The lot is provided with and has been fully assessed for sanitary sewer. <br /> 5. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to <br /> it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting <br /> the variance will not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air, nor pose a fire <br /> hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> convenience to the applicants,but is necessary to aileviate a demonstrable hardship <br /> or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.