My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2003 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-24-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 4:25:29 PM
Creation date
5/16/2012 4:25:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2003 <br />• 8. #03 -2951 Judith and James Pierpont, 1849 and 1801 West Farm Road —Lot <br />Line Rearrangement — Continued <br />owners had blacktopped part of the drive, and they finished the blacktopping. The drive <br />connected Farm and Homestead streets and was used by neighbors. The neighbor who <br />lived on Homestead at the end of the driveway informed the Pierponts that they were <br />nervous about a road exiting opposite their house, so the Pierponts blocked the access to <br />Homestead by installing a mound at the end of the drive and planting it. The Pierponts <br />did not understand the need to remove a drive that had been in existence for so long when <br />its presence did not impact anybody negatively. <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated that when they bought the house, it was in disrepair and the stable <br />was derelict. They wanted to keep the character of the property. They kept the roof, walls <br />and foundation of the stable and converted it to a guest house with an alcove kitchen, <br />bathroom, balcony, and bedroom. She stated that the guesthouse is only ever used by <br />family members or close friends who visit, with the exception of allowing guests of their <br />church to stay briefly on two occasions. They have tried to add value to the neighborhood <br />with the changes they've made, while keeping the original charm and style of the <br />property. <br />She stated that they originally believed the lots were connected in order to provide <br />• alternative sites for septic. She stated they plan to bring sewer hookups to both lots 14 <br />and 15. <br />• <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated that her husband figured they have 13,000 s.f. (7.5 %) of wetland on <br />their property with lakeshore frontage. According to his calculations, they do have <br />enough dry buildable to keep the guesthouse. She stated they would gladly sign an <br />agreement stating the house is only to be used by family members and that it would never <br />generate an income. <br />Murphy stated that the City should do a better job of protecting historic properties. <br />Gaffron asked if they would be ignoring the preservation of a historic structure by merely <br />requiring the kitchen to be removed. The 4 -acre requirement has to do with density. The <br />code doesn't distinguish between constant use and occasional use. The Pierponts seem <br />willing to limit the use of the house. Wetland is not credited in terms of density when a <br />property is sewered. Still, the situation has existed for over 13 years with no negative <br />impacts. There is, however, a precedent setting concern if the City allowed the situation <br />to continue as is. <br />Murphy stated that they need a unique situation in order to find a hardship. Mrs. Pierpont <br />stated that the age of the house and guesthouse make it a unique situation. They were <br />built in 1870. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.