My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-2003 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2003
>
11-24-2003 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/16/2012 4:25:29 PM
Creation date
5/16/2012 4:25:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, NOVEMBER 24, 2003 <br />8. #03 -2951 Judith and James Pierpont, 1849 and 1801 West Farm Road —Lot <br />Line Rearrangement -- Continued <br />Resolution No. 2854. The applicants' intent is to yield two lots that are conforming for <br />the intended uses with the easterly lot totally 4- acres. This can only be accomplished if <br />the wetland area is attributable for the 4 -acre guest house requirement. Planning <br />Commission concluded that the wetland area is not attributable and that the guesthouse <br />use should be discontinued, the kitchen removed, and a "Plumbing in Accessory Building <br />CUP" be applied for. <br />Gaffron stated that at the time the CUP was granted for the guesthouse, the lots should <br />have been combined, yielding a lot with over 5 dry contiguous acres. For unknown <br />reasons, the applicants never completed the legal combination. They requested the lot line <br />rearrangement in order to maximize the area of the homestead parcel while retaining the <br />minimum 2.0 dry buildable acres in Lot 14 for future development or sale. <br />The result would be a lot with 3 acres of dry buildable and 1 acre of wetland. The <br />Planning Commission felt that was not adequate to allow the guesthouse to remain. <br />Gaffron stated that the applicants would have to make necessary easement vacations in <br />exchange for dedication of new easements along the new lot line. <br />There is a driveway on the property that has existed for many decades. The Planning • <br />Commission suggests it be removed by 2004. The applicants suggested that the drive <br />ought to be left alone as it poses no complications to any one. <br />Gaffron stated that the City Attorney advised that the application for conversion of the <br />guesthouse to Plumbing in an Accessory Structure be a separate application and should <br />not be added to the current application. Planning Commission discussed the fact that the <br />guest facilities did not meet location standards for the Plumbing CUP but concluded that <br />because the building has been in the present location for many decades, is far from any <br />neighboring residence, has no negative visual impacts, and is a historic structure dating in <br />part to the 1870's, any negative impacts of such a CUP would be limited. <br />Gaffron passed out copies of a letter from Mr. Pierpont. <br />Sansevere asked if the applicants intended to apply for the plumbing CUP. Mrs. Pierpont <br />stated that the guesthouse had partial plumbing when they bought the property and applied <br />for the conversion permit in 1990. <br />Mrs. Pierpont stated that the letter from her husband covered all the Planning Commission <br />points. She summarized. They have no problem with the requirement to change the <br />utility easements. <br />The driveway recommended for removal has been in existence since the 1870's. Previous • <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.