My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2656
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 2600 - 2699 (March 13, 1989 - September 11, 1989)
>
Resolution 2656
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2016 2:10:02 PM
Creation date
7/11/2016 2:10:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
., o <br /> - � ��� ;.��� Cit� o� ORONO <br /> �,s x: <br /> � .,;:.ti i, <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> Q�` `� <br /> '`". � , NO. 2656 <br /> ,• - • •� , <br /> � <br /> � . <br /> � • _ _ <br /> i <br /> G) The proposed variances for hardcover and average <br /> setback are required in order to reconstruct the <br /> i <br /> existing deck, which is in poor condition and must be <br /> ` replaced for safety of the occupants of the property. <br /> The applicants also propose to construct an additional <br /> ; deck adjacent to the existing deck. Both the existing <br /> �� and proposed deck encroach past the average lakeshore <br /> � - setback line but due to topography on the adjacent <br /> properties, combined with the configuration and site <br /> ! � layouts of neighboring lots, the proposed decks will <br /> f cause no reduction in views of� the lake enjoyed by <br /> ( � either neighboring property. <br /> � ` <br /> �, •� D) All the proposed deck construction is in the 75- <br /> � 250 ' zone. There is no hardcover in the 0-75 ' zone. <br /> � E) Applicants can remove existing plastic from beneath <br /> E, existing decorative rock beds to result in no net <br /> �' increase in hardcover on the property the 37.1� <br /> hardcover which exists now in the 75-250' zone. <br /> � . <br /> i�� 4.` The City Council ° has considered this application <br /> I including the findings and recommendations of the Planning <br /> � Commission, reports by City staff , comments by the <br /> ( applicants and the effect of the proposed variances on the <br /> f health, safety and welfare of the community. <br /> # 5. The City Counci 1 f inds that the conditions exi sting on <br /> � this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally <br /> to other property in this zoning district; that granting the <br /> � variances would not adversely aff.ect traffic conditions, <br /> � light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to <br /> ; neighboring property; would not merely serve as a <br /> � convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate <br /> a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to <br /> � preserve a substantial property right of the applicants; and <br /> would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning <br /> r ��, Code and Comprehensive P1an of_ the City. <br /> �.1� <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> � <br /> ' - — -- ----- ---- _- -- — . <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.