My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-2002 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2002
>
12-09-2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2012 4:09:26 PM
Creation date
4/13/2012 4:09:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MONDAY, DECEMBER 9, 2002 <br />• 10. #02- 2789/02 -2840 Dahlstrom Development LLC, "2550" Wayzata <br />Boulevard West —Final Development Plan Approvals <br />Gaffron stated that the applicants were requesting the Council grant them preliminary plat <br />Approval and General Development Plan Approval. The MCWD had yet to grant <br />stormwater /drainage plan approval. It was uncertain whether MCWD approval would <br />result in changes that impact the plat layout, especially concerning the wetland impacts. <br />Wetland approval is a prerequisite of general development plan approval. <br />Staff was working on plans to avoid the backup of stormwater with the applicant's <br />engineer. The City was asking for an overland outlet to accommodate back -to -back <br />superstorm events. <br />The most recently received Plan Sheets had not been completely reviewed by staff. <br />Staff provided the following three options for Council action: 1. adopting the Draft <br />Resolution and Rezoning Ordinance subject to MCWD approval, and if significant <br />changes resulted, bringing it back to Council; 2. conceptually approving the Draft <br />Resolution and Rezoning Ordinance, with final adoption withheld until MCWD approval <br />is given; 3. tabling formal action until MCWD approval is completed and all issues are <br />addressed. <br />• Gaffron stated that Council had already reviewed the Developer's fee proposals. <br />Sansevere asked what staff would recommend. Gaffron stated option 2 or 3 would be <br />appropriate. He did not want to approve the plans without the MWCD approval as things <br />could change. <br />Murphy stated that the applicants would be coming back before Council for other issues, <br />like lighting. <br />Steve Johnston, of Landform, Inc., stated they had been coming to the Council for nine <br />months and have always been responsible for whatever the City requires. They needed to <br />show their investors and bankers something solid at this point to maintain backing. They <br />needed to send a message that the City is committed to the project. He requested they <br />approve the plans and place all the qualifiers necessary on the approval. <br />Sansevere asked if the investors were the City's concern. White stated that delay was <br />surely adding to the project costs. He stated it was time to share the risk and stop dragging <br />out the process. <br />Johnston stated they would still need final plat approval. Moorse stated that approving the <br />preliminary plat indicates that the final plat would be approved. He stated that conceptual <br />• approval should send a strong enough message to the investors. Moorse stated Council <br />E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.